Core Scientific (CORZ) vs TeraWulf (WULF)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
TeraWulf (WULF) has outperformed Core Scientific (CORZ) over the past year, gaining 19.0% versus a loss of 6.8%. TeraWulf is the larger company by market cap ($6.65 billion vs $4.94 billion), about 1.3 times the size. Core Scientific converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of -90.5% versus -392.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CORZ | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $15.39 | $13.34 |
| Market cap | $4.94B | $6.65B |
| 1-day change | -3.48% | -7.40% |
| YTD return | +9.48% | +25.33% |
| 1-year return | -6.78% | +19.01% |
| 5-year return | — | -52.08% |
| Forward P/E | 94.53 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $-4.25 | $-4.43 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $319.02M | $168.46M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -37.53% | +20.28% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-288.62M | $-661.42M |
| Gross margin | 11.88% | 39.21% |
| Operating margin | -76.98% | -110.54% |
| Net margin | -90.47% | -392.64% |
| 52-week high | $30.46 | $29.84 |
| 52-week low | $13.36 | $10.47 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -49.49% | -55.31% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +114.82% | +151.07% |
| Average volume | 11.80M | 31.10M |
| Shares outstanding | 321.34M | 498.97M |
| Employees | 325 | 141 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Finance: Consumer Services | Finance: Consumer Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- WULF has outperformed CORZ by 25.8 percentage points over the past year.
- Core Scientific is more profitable, keeping -90.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -392.6 cents for TeraWulf.
- TeraWulf grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+20.28% vs -37.53%).
About Core Scientific
CORZ stock →Core Scientific, Inc. provides infrastructure for high-density colocation services and digital asset mining in the United States.
Finance · Finance: Consumer Services · 325 employees
About TeraWulf
WULF stock →TeraWulf Inc., together with its subsidiaries, owns, develops, operates digital infrastructure in the United States. It also develops and operates bitcoin mining facilities for bitcoin mining and high-performance computing workloads, leveraging clean, cost-effective, and reliable energy.
Finance · Finance: Consumer Services · 141 employees
CORZ vs WULF FAQ
Which is bigger, Core Scientific or TeraWulf?
TeraWulf (WULF) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.65B compared with $4.94B for Core Scientific (CORZ).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CORZ or WULF?
WULF returned +19.01% over the past 12 months, compared with -6.78% for CORZ (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Are Core Scientific and TeraWulf in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Finance: Consumer Services industry within the Finance sector.