Cementos PacasmayoA. (CPAC) vs Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Cementos PacasmayoA. (CPAC) has outperformed Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) over the past year, gaining 68.5% versus a gain of 28.5%. Over five years, CPAC leads with a +109.8% price change compared with +39.0% for LOMA. Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima is the larger company by market cap ($1.18 billion vs $1.05 billion), about 1.1 times the size.
On valuation, Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima trades at a lower forward P/E (13.2x vs 14.4x for Cementos PacasmayoA.). Cementos PacasmayoA. pays a dividend yielding 3.34%, while Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CPAC | LOMA |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $12.27 | $10.12 |
| Market cap | $1.05B | $1.18B |
| 1-day change | +0.16% | +1.10% |
| YTD return | +17.56% | -22.70% |
| 1-year return | +68.50% | +28.50% |
| 5-year return | +109.76% | +39.03% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 17.28 | 32.65 |
| Forward P/E | 14.44 | 13.15 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.71 | $0.31 |
| Dividend yield | 3.34% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.41 | $0.00 |
| 52-week high | $12.74 | $13.20 |
| 52-week low | $6.25 | $7.47 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -3.69% | -23.33% |
| Analyst consensus | none | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +4.24% | +41.30% |
| Average volume | 48.29K | 414.94K |
| Shares outstanding | 84.77M | 116.70M |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Building Materials | Building Materials |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CPAC has outperformed LOMA by 40.0 percentage points over the past year.
- Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima trades at a higher earnings multiple (32.6x vs 17.3x trailing P/E).
- Cementos PacasmayoA. offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.34% vs 0.00%).
About Cementos PacasmayoA.
CPAC stock →Cementos Pacasmayo S.A.A. produces, distributes, and sells cement and cement-related materials in Peru.
Industrials · Building Materials
About Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima
LOMA stock →Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures and sells cement and its derivatives in Argentina. It operates through Cement, Masonry Cement, and Lime; Concrete; Railroad; Aggregates; and Others segments.
Industrials · Building Materials
CPAC vs LOMA FAQ
Which is bigger, Cementos PacasmayoA. or Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima?
Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $1.18B compared with $1.05B for Cementos PacasmayoA. (CPAC).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CPAC or LOMA?
CPAC returned +68.50% over the past 12 months, compared with +28.50% for LOMA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CPAC or LOMA?
CPAC has the lower trailing P/E at 17.3, versus 32.6 for LOMA. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Cementos PacasmayoA. or Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima?
Cementos PacasmayoA. pays a dividend yielding 3.34%, while Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Cementos PacasmayoA. and Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Building Materials industry within the Industrials sector.