Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) vs Helmerich & Payne (HP)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Helmerich & Payne (HP) has outperformed Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) over the past year, gaining 67.0% versus a loss of 7.5%. Over five years, HP leads with a +21.0% price change compared with +0.3% for CPK. Helmerich & Payne is the larger company by market cap ($4.02 billion vs $3.20 billion), about 1.3 times the size.
On valuation, Chesapeake Utilities trades at a lower forward P/E (17.2x vs 25.9x for Helmerich & Payne). Helmerich & Payne offers the higher dividend yield (2.49% vs 2.20%). Chesapeake Utilities converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 15.1% versus -4.4%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CPK | HP |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $126.86 | $40.22 |
| Market cap | $3.20B | $4.02B |
| 1-day change | -0.76% | +1.47% |
| YTD return | +2.46% | +38.21% |
| 1-year return | -7.45% | +67.05% |
| 5-year return | +0.29% | +21.00% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 20.23 | — |
| Forward P/E | 17.23 | 25.87 |
| EPS (TTM) | $6.27 | $-1.39 |
| Dividend yield | 2.20% | 2.49% |
| Annual dividend | $2.79 | $1.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $930.00M | $3.75B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +18.14% | +35.89% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $140.30M | $-163.69M |
| Gross margin | — | 32.96% |
| Operating margin | 27.52% | 0.09% |
| Net margin | 15.09% | -4.37% |
| 52-week high | $140.83 | $48.17 |
| 52-week low | $118.88 | $21.73 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -9.92% | -16.50% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +16.47% | +12.20% |
| Average volume | 193.06K | 1.20M |
| Shares outstanding | 25.25M | 99.94M |
| Employees | 1,300 | 15,700 |
| Sector | Utilities | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Production | Oil & Gas Production |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- HP has outperformed CPK by 74.5 percentage points over the past year.
- Chesapeake Utilities is more profitable, keeping 15.1 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -4.4 cents for Helmerich & Payne.
- Helmerich & Payne grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+35.89% vs +18.14%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Chesapeake Utilities in Utilities and Helmerich & Payne in Energy.
About Chesapeake Utilities
CPK stock →Chesapeake Utilities Corporation operates as an energy delivery company in the United States. It operates through two segments: Regulated Energy and Unregulated Energy.
Utilities · Oil & Gas Production · 1,300 employees
About Helmerich & Payne
HP stock →Helmerich & Payne, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides drilling solutions and technologies for oil and gas exploration and production companies. The company operates through North America Solutions, Offshore Solutions, and International Solutions segments.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 15,700 employees
CPK vs HP FAQ
Which is bigger, Chesapeake Utilities or Helmerich & Payne?
Helmerich & Payne (HP) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.02B compared with $3.20B for Chesapeake Utilities (CPK).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CPK or HP?
HP returned +67.05% over the past 12 months, compared with -7.45% for CPK (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Chesapeake Utilities or Helmerich & Payne?
Helmerich & Payne has the higher yield at 2.49%, compared with 2.20% for Chesapeake Utilities.
Are Chesapeake Utilities and Helmerich & Payne in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Utilities sector.