Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) vs Northern Oil and Gas (NOG)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Northern Oil and Gas (NOG) has outperformed Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) over the past year, losing 2.7% versus a loss of 7.5%. Over five years, CPK leads with a +0.3% price change compared with -4.0% for NOG. Chesapeake Utilities is the larger company by market cap ($3.24 billion vs $2.68 billion), about 1.2 times the size.
On valuation, Northern Oil and Gas trades at a lower forward P/E (5.5x vs 17.4x for Chesapeake Utilities). Northern Oil and Gas offers the higher dividend yield (7.16% vs 2.18%). Chesapeake Utilities converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 15.1% versus 1.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CPK | NOG |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $128.16 | $25.14 |
| Market cap | $3.24B | $2.68B |
| 1-day change | +0.26% | +3.97% |
| YTD return | +2.46% | +12.62% |
| 1-year return | -7.45% | -2.74% |
| 5-year return | +0.29% | -4.01% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 20.44 | — |
| Forward P/E | 17.41 | 5.52 |
| EPS (TTM) | $6.27 | $-4.85 |
| Dividend yield | 2.18% | 7.16% |
| Annual dividend | $2.79 | $1.80 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $930.00M | $2.48B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +18.14% | +11.23% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $140.30M | $38.76M |
| Gross margin | — | 80.87% |
| Operating margin | 27.52% | 9.93% |
| Net margin | 15.09% | 1.57% |
| 52-week high | $140.83 | $31.17 |
| 52-week low | $118.88 | $17.18 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -9.00% | -19.35% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +15.29% | +21.08% |
| Average volume | 193.06K | 2.35M |
| Shares outstanding | 25.25M | 106.55M |
| Employees | 1,300 | 64 |
| Sector | Utilities | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Production | Oil & Gas Production |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Northern Oil and Gas offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (7.16% vs 2.18%).
- Chesapeake Utilities is more profitable, keeping 15.1 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 1.6 cents for Northern Oil and Gas.
- Chesapeake Utilities grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+18.14% vs +11.23%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Chesapeake Utilities in Utilities and Northern Oil and Gas in Energy.
About Chesapeake Utilities
CPK stock →Chesapeake Utilities Corporation operates as an energy delivery company in the United States. It operates through two segments: Regulated Energy and Unregulated Energy.
Utilities · Oil & Gas Production · 1,300 employees
About Northern Oil and Gas
NOG stock →Northern Oil and Gas, Inc., an independent energy company, engages in the acquisition, exploration, exploitation, development, and production of crude oil and natural gas properties in the United States. Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production · 64 employees
CPK vs NOG FAQ
Which is bigger, Chesapeake Utilities or Northern Oil and Gas?
Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.24B compared with $2.68B for Northern Oil and Gas (NOG).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CPK or NOG?
NOG returned -2.74% over the past 12 months, compared with -7.45% for CPK (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Chesapeake Utilities or Northern Oil and Gas?
Northern Oil and Gas has the higher yield at 7.16%, compared with 2.18% for Chesapeake Utilities.
Are Chesapeake Utilities and Northern Oil and Gas in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Utilities sector.