MetaCap

CPS Technologies (CPSH) vs Smith-Midland (SMID)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

CPS Technologies (CPSH) has outperformed Smith-Midland (SMID) over the past year, gaining 1.7% versus a loss of 38.2%. Over five years, SMID leads with a +23.5% price change compared with -28.0% for CPSH. Smith-Midland is the larger company by market cap ($117.8 million vs $69.4 million), about 1.7 times the size.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CPSH+1.69%SMID-38.18%
+241%+94%-52%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
CPSH-26.23%SMID+41.31%
+227%+70%-87%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CPSH versus SMID key metrics
MetricCPSHSMID
Share price$3.60$22.20
Market cap$69.37M$117.76M
1-day change0.00%-1.68%
YTD return+16.50%-38.91%
1-year return+1.69%-38.18%
5-year return-28.00%+23.47%
P/E ratio (TTM)—15.31
EPS (TTM)$0.00$1.45
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.00
52-week high$14.39$42.15
52-week low$3.03$21.89
Distance from 52-week high-74.98%-47.33%
Analyst consensusnone—
Avg. price target upside+66.67%—
Average volume243.85K14.79K
Shares outstanding19.27M5.30M
Employees117179
SectorTechnologyBasic Materials
IndustryElectronic ComponentsBuilding Materials

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • CPSH has outperformed SMID by 39.9 percentage points over the past year.
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: CPS Technologies in Technology and Smith-Midland in Basic Materials.

About CPS Technologies

CPSH stock →

CPS Technologies Corporation produces and sells advanced material solutions to the transportation, automotive, energy, computing/internet, telecommunication, aerospace, defense, and oil and gas markets in the United States, Germany, rest of Europe, Asia, and internationally. The company offers metal matrix composites, such as baseplates for various applications, including motor controllers used in electric trains, subway cars, wind turbines, hybrid and electric vehicles, and transmission of high voltage direct current; hermetic packages for use in radar, satellite, and avionics applications; baseplates and housings used in modules built with wide band gap semiconductors; and lids and heat spreaders for use in internet switches and routers.

Technology · Electronic Components · 117 employees

About Smith-Midland

SMID stock →

Smith-Midland Corporation invents, develops, manufactures, markets, leases, licenses, sells, and installs various precast concrete products and systems. The company offers SlenderWall lightweight construction panel, a lightweight exterior cladding used for the exterior walls of buildings; Sierra Wall that provides sound and sight barrier for use alongside highways around residential, industrial, and commercial properties; J-J Hooks highway safety barriers, which are used on roadways to separate lanes of traffic in construction work zone or traffic control purposes; and Easi-Set precast building and Easi-Span expandable precast buildings for use in housing communications operations, traffic control systems, and mechanical and electrical stations.

Basic Materials · Building Materials · 179 employees

CPSH vs SMID FAQ

Which is bigger, CPS Technologies or Smith-Midland?

Smith-Midland (SMID) is larger, with a market capitalization of $117.76M compared with $69.37M for CPS Technologies (CPSH).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CPSH or SMID?

CPSH returned +1.69% over the past 12 months, compared with -38.18% for SMID (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Are CPS Technologies and Smith-Midland in the same industry?

No. CPS Technologies is in the Technology sector, while Smith-Midland is in Basic Materials.

More comparisons