MetaCap

Circle Internet Group (CRCL) vs Tradeweb Markets (TW)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Tradeweb Markets (TW) has outperformed Circle Internet Group (CRCL) over the past year, gaining 2.7% versus a loss of 46.3%. Tradeweb Markets is the larger company by market cap ($23.69 billion vs $20.52 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while Circle Internet Group is growing revenue faster (+63.9% vs +18.9%). On valuation, Tradeweb Markets trades at a lower forward P/E (23.7x vs 57.2x for Circle Internet Group).

Tradeweb Markets pays a dividend yielding 0.47%, while Circle Internet Group does not currently pay one. Tradeweb Markets converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 39.6% versus -2.5%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CRCL-45.64%TW+2.69%
+25%-23%-71%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
CRCL-24.94%TW-23.31%
+132%+38%-56%
Jun 2, 20255 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CRCL versus TW key metrics
MetricCRCLTW
Share price$80.84$109.68
Market cap$20.52B$23.69B
1-day change0.00%+2.12%
YTD return+1.94%-0.13%
1-year return-46.27%+2.69%
5-year return—+28.65%
P/E ratio (TTM)55.3726.24
Forward P/E57.2523.67
EPS (TTM)$1.46$4.18
Dividend yield0.00%0.47%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.52
Revenue (latest FY)$2.75B$2.05B
Revenue growth (YoY)+63.86%+18.92%
Net income (latest FY)$-69.51M$812.79M
Operating margin-3.51%40.70%
Net margin-2.53%39.60%
52-week high$159.47$127.69
52-week low$49.90$91.42
Distance from 52-week high-49.31%-14.10%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+30.58%+12.63%
Average volume13.75M1.41M
Shares outstanding234.69M114.04M
Employees1,1001,613
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryFinance: Consumer ServicesInvestment Bankers/Brokers/Service

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • TW has outperformed CRCL by 49.0 percentage points over the past year.
  • Circle Internet Group trades at a higher earnings multiple (55.4x vs 26.2x trailing P/E).
  • Tradeweb Markets is more profitable, keeping 39.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -2.5 cents for Circle Internet Group.
  • Circle Internet Group grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+63.86% vs +18.92%).

About Circle Internet Group

CRCL stock →

Circle Internet Group, Inc. operates as a platform, network, and market infrastructure for stablecoin and blockchain applications.

Finance · Finance: Consumer Services · 1,100 employees

About Tradeweb Markets

TW stock →

Tradeweb Markets Inc. builds and operates electronic marketplaces in the United States and internationally.

Finance · Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service · 1,613 employees

CRCL vs TW FAQ

Which is bigger, Circle Internet Group or Tradeweb Markets?

Tradeweb Markets (TW) is larger, with a market capitalization of $23.69B compared with $20.52B for Circle Internet Group (CRCL).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CRCL or TW?

TW returned +2.69% over the past 12 months, compared with -46.27% for CRCL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CRCL or TW?

TW has the lower trailing P/E at 26.2, versus 55.4 for CRCL. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Circle Internet Group or Tradeweb Markets?

Tradeweb Markets pays a dividend yielding 0.47%, while Circle Internet Group does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Circle Internet Group and Tradeweb Markets in the same industry?

Both are in the Finance sector, but in different industries: Finance: Consumer Services for Circle Internet Group and Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service for Tradeweb Markets.

More comparisons