MetaCap

Cricut (CRCT) vs Energizer (ENR)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Cricut (CRCT) has outperformed Energizer (ENR) over the past year, gaining 12.9% versus a loss of 12.4%. Over five years, ENR leads with a -43.5% price change compared with -75.9% for CRCT. Energizer is the larger company by market cap ($1.47 billion vs $1.34 billion), about 1.1 times the size.

On valuation, Energizer trades at a lower forward P/E (6.3x vs 27.1x for Cricut). Energizer offers the higher dividend yield (5.60% vs 3.13%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CRCT+12.87%ENR-12.42%
+17%-10%-36%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
CRCT-76.39%ENR-44.98%
+10%-40%-91%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CRCT versus ENR key metrics
MetricCRCTENR
Share price$6.40$21.44
Market cap$1.34B$1.47B
1-day change+0.63%-0.46%
YTD return+29.29%+7.79%
1-year return+12.87%-12.42%
5-year return-75.91%-43.52%
P/E ratio (TTM)15.6118.02
Forward P/E27.086.34
EPS (TTM)$0.41$1.19
Dividend yield3.13%5.60%
Annual dividend$0.20$1.20
Revenue (latest FY)—$2.95B
Revenue growth (YoY)—+2.28%
Net income (latest FY)—$239.00M
Gross margin—41.75%
Net margin—8.09%
52-week high$6.66$25.35
52-week low$3.74$15.75
Distance from 52-week high-3.90%-15.42%
Analyst consensusnonenone
Avg. price target upside-36.41%+4.15%
Average volume724.55K1.01M
Shares outstanding55.02M68.48M
Employees7006,050
SectorTechnologyMiscellaneous
IndustryIndustrial Machinery/ComponentsIndustrial Machinery/Components

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • CRCT has outperformed ENR by 25.3 percentage points over the past year.
  • Energizer offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (5.60% vs 3.13%).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: Cricut in Technology and Energizer in Miscellaneous.

About Cricut

CRCT stock →

Cricut, Inc. engages in the design, marketing, and distribution of a creativity platform that enables users to turn ideas into professional-looking handmade goods in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, Western Europe, the Middle East, Latin America, South Africa, and Asia.

Technology · Industrial Machinery/Components · 700 employees

About Energizer

ENR stock →

Energizer Holdings, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, manufactures, markets, and distributes household batteries, specialty batteries, and lighting products worldwide. It offers household batteries, including primary, rechargeable, specialty, and hearing aid under the Energizer, Eveready, Rayovac, and Varta brands; and protectants, wipes, tire and wheel care products, glass cleaners, leather care products, air fresheners, and washes under the Armor All, Nu Finish, Refresh Your Car!, LEXOL, Eagle One, NEVR-DULL, California Scents, Driven, Bahama & Co, Carnu, Grand Prix, Kit, Tempo, and Centralsul brands.

Miscellaneous · Industrial Machinery/Components · 6,050 employees

CRCT vs ENR FAQ

Which is bigger, Cricut or Energizer?

Energizer (ENR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $1.47B compared with $1.34B for Cricut (CRCT).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CRCT or ENR?

CRCT returned +12.87% over the past 12 months, compared with -12.42% for ENR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CRCT or ENR?

CRCT has the lower trailing P/E at 15.6, versus 18.0 for ENR. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Cricut or Energizer?

Energizer has the higher yield at 5.60%, compared with 3.13% for Cricut.

Are Cricut and Energizer in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons