CRH (CRH) vs CemexB. de C.V. Sponsored (CX)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
CemexB. de C.V. Sponsored (CX) has outperformed CRH (CRH) over the past year, gaining 5.4% versus a loss of 30.0%. Over five years, CRH leads with a +71.5% price change compared with +33.9% for CX. CRH is the larger company by market cap ($54.19 billion vs $13.84 billion), about 3.9 times the size.
On valuation, CemexB. de C.V. Sponsored trades at a lower forward P/E (10.6x vs 12.7x for CRH). CRH pays a dividend yielding 1.87%, while CemexB. de C.V. Sponsored does not currently pay one. CRH converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 10.0% versus 5.8%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CRH | CX |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $81.46 | $9.59 |
| Market cap | $54.19B | $13.84B |
| 1-day change | -2.56% | -3.33% |
| YTD return | -34.73% | -16.54% |
| 1-year return | -29.98% | +5.38% |
| 5-year return | +71.46% | +33.94% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 14.76 | 87.18 |
| Forward P/E | 12.71 | 10.60 |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.52 | $0.11 |
| Dividend yield | 1.87% | 1.30% |
| Annual dividend | $1.52 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $37.45B | $16.20B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +5.27% | -2.14% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $3.75B | $939.00M |
| Gross margin | 36.13% | 33.57% |
| Operating margin | 14.53% | 11.24% |
| Net margin | 10.02% | 5.80% |
| 52-week high | $131.55 | $13.67 |
| 52-week low | $80.13 | $9.08 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -38.08% | -29.85% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +59.13% | +54.43% |
| Average volume | 4.71M | 6.85M |
| Shares outstanding | 665.28M | 1.44B |
| Employees | 83,032 | 38,495 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Building Materials | Building Materials |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CRH is about 3.9 times larger than CemexB. de C.V. Sponsored by market value ($54.19B vs $13.84B).
- CX has outperformed CRH by 35.4 percentage points over the past year.
- CemexB. de C.V. Sponsored trades at a higher earnings multiple (87.2x vs 14.8x trailing P/E).
- CRH grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+5.27% vs -2.14%).
About CRH
CRH stock →CRH plc, together with its subsidiaries, provides building materials solutions in Ireland, the United States, the United Kingdom, rest of Europe, and internationally. It operates through three segments: Americas Materials Solutions, Americas Building Solutions, and International Solutions.
Industrials · Building Materials · 83,032 employees
About CemexB. de C.V. Sponsored
CX stock →CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the production, marketing, distribution, and sale of cement, ready-mix concrete, aggregates, urbanization solutions, and other construction materials and services worldwide.
Industrials · Building Materials · 38,495 employees
CRH vs CX FAQ
Which is bigger, CRH or CemexB. de C.V. Sponsored?
CRH (CRH) is larger, with a market capitalization of $54.19B compared with $13.84B for CemexB. de C.V. Sponsored (CX).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CRH or CX?
CX returned +5.38% over the past 12 months, compared with -29.98% for CRH (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CRH or CX?
CRH has the lower trailing P/E at 14.8, versus 87.2 for CX. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRH or CemexB. de C.V. Sponsored?
CRH has the higher yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.30% for CemexB. de C.V. Sponsored.
Are CRH and CemexB. de C.V. Sponsored in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Building Materials industry within the Industrials sector.