Crocs (CROX) vs Deckers Outdoor (DECK)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Crocs (CROX) has outperformed Deckers Outdoor (DECK) over the past year, gaining 46.2% versus a loss of 18.0%. Over five years, DECK leads with a +34.6% price change compared with -16.0% for CROX. Deckers Outdoor is the larger company by market cap ($10.95 billion vs $5.52 billion), about 2.0 times the size.
On valuation, Crocs trades at a lower forward P/E (7.7x vs 9.7x for Deckers Outdoor). Deckers Outdoor converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 18.7% versus -2.0%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CROX | DECK |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $115.20 | $80.38 |
| Market cap | $5.52B | $10.95B |
| 1-day change | -4.18% | -1.57% |
| YTD return | +34.71% | -22.47% |
| 1-year return | +46.16% | -17.96% |
| 5-year return | -16.03% | +34.61% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 10.10 | 11.37 |
| Forward P/E | 7.71 | 9.65 |
| EPS (TTM) | $11.41 | $7.07 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $4.04B | $5.47B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -1.50% | +9.76% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-81.20M | $1.02B |
| Gross margin | 58.33% | 57.70% |
| Operating margin | 3.70% | 23.08% |
| Net margin | -2.01% | 18.71% |
| 52-week high | $141.28 | $122.29 |
| 52-week low | $73.21 | $77.20 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -18.46% | -34.27% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +20.01% | +49.80% |
| Average volume | 1.05M | 2.79M |
| Shares outstanding | 47.95M | 136.18M |
| Employees | 8,010 | 6,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Shoe Manufacturing | Shoe Manufacturing |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- CROX has outperformed DECK by 64.1 percentage points over the past year.
- Deckers Outdoor is more profitable, keeping 18.7 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -2.0 cents for Crocs.
- Deckers Outdoor grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+9.76% vs -1.50%).
About Crocs
CROX stock →Crocs, Inc. together with its subsidiaries, designs, develops, manufactures, markets, distributes, and sells casual lifestyle footwear and accessories for men, women, and kids under the Crocs and HEYDUDE Brands in the United States and internationally.
Consumer Discretionary · Shoe Manufacturing · 8,010 employees
About Deckers Outdoor
DECK stock →Deckers Outdoor Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, designs, markets, and distributes footwear, apparel, and accessories for casual lifestyle use and high-performance activities in the United States and internationally. The company offers footwear, apparel, and accessories under the UGG brand; footwear, such as running, trail, hiking, fitness, and lifestyle shoes, as well as apparel and accessories under the HOKA brand; and sandals, shoes, and boots under the Teva brand name.
Consumer Discretionary · Shoe Manufacturing · 6,000 employees
CROX vs DECK FAQ
Which is bigger, Crocs or Deckers Outdoor?
Deckers Outdoor (DECK) is larger, with a market capitalization of $10.95B compared with $5.52B for Crocs (CROX).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CROX or DECK?
CROX returned +46.16% over the past 12 months, compared with -17.96% for DECK (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CROX or DECK?
CROX has the lower trailing P/E at 10.1, versus 11.4 for DECK. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Are Crocs and Deckers Outdoor in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Shoe Manufacturing industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.