MetaCap

CoStar Group (CSGP) vs Terreno Realty (TRNO)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

Terreno Realty (TRNO) has outperformed CoStar Group (CSGP) over the past year, gaining 9.0% versus a loss of 65.8%. Over five years, TRNO leads with a -7.0% price change compared with -70.6% for CSGP. CoStar Group is the larger company by market cap ($11.18 billion vs $6.90 billion), about 1.6 times the size, while Terreno Realty is growing revenue faster (+24.5% vs +18.7%).

On valuation, CoStar Group trades at a lower forward P/E (15.5x vs 35.9x for Terreno Realty). Terreno Realty pays a dividend yielding 3.28%, while CoStar Group does not currently pay one. Terreno Realty converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 84.6% versus 0.2%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CSGP-65.76%TRNO+9.04%
+33%-19%-71%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
CSGP-68.23%TRNO-2.85%
+35%-19%-73%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CSGP versus TRNO key metrics
MetricCSGPTRNO
Share price$27.60$63.34
Market cap$11.18B$6.90B
1-day change-0.11%-1.39%
YTD return-58.95%+8.41%
1-year return-65.76%+9.04%
5-year return-70.58%-7.02%
P/E ratio (TTM)153.3317.03
Forward P/E15.5335.89
EPS (TTM)$0.18$3.72
Dividend yield0.00%3.28%
Annual dividend$0.00$2.08
Revenue (latest FY)$3.25B$476.38M
Revenue growth (YoY)+18.68%+24.51%
Net income (latest FY)$7.00M$402.99M
Gross margin78.87%—
Operating margin-2.22%—
Net margin0.22%84.59%
52-week high$79.21$78.94
52-week low$25.89$55.92
Distance from 52-week high-65.16%-19.76%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+35.14%+17.02%
Average volume6.93M748.55K
Shares outstanding405.20M108.97M
Employees8,44147
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryReal EstateReal Estate

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • TRNO has outperformed CSGP by 74.8 percentage points over the past year.
  • CoStar Group trades at a higher earnings multiple (153.3x vs 17.0x trailing P/E).
  • Terreno Realty offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.28% vs 0.00%).
  • Terreno Realty is more profitable, keeping 84.6 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 0.2 cents for CoStar Group.
  • Terreno Realty grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+24.51% vs +18.68%).

About CoStar Group

CSGP stock →

CoStar Group, Inc. provides information, analytics, and online marketplace services to real estate and related business communities in the United States, Australia, Canada, Europe, the Asia Pacific, and Latin America.

Finance · Real Estate · 8,441 employees

About Terreno Realty

TRNO stock →

Terreno Realty Corporation an acquirer, owner and operator of industrial real estate in six major coastal U.S. markets.

Finance · Real Estate · 47 employees

CSGP vs TRNO FAQ

Which is bigger, CoStar Group or Terreno Realty?

CoStar Group (CSGP) is larger, with a market capitalization of $11.18B compared with $6.90B for Terreno Realty (TRNO).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CSGP or TRNO?

TRNO returned +9.04% over the past 12 months, compared with -65.76% for CSGP (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CSGP or TRNO?

TRNO has the lower trailing P/E at 17.0, versus 153.3 for CSGP. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, CoStar Group or Terreno Realty?

Terreno Realty pays a dividend yielding 3.28%, while CoStar Group does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are CoStar Group and Terreno Realty in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Real Estate industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons