MetaCap

Calamos Strategic Total Return (CSQ) vs Reaves Utility Income Fund (UTG)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Reaves Utility Income Fund is the larger company by market cap ($3.31 billion vs $3.30 billion), about 1.0 times the size. On valuation, Reaves Utility Income Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (2.6x vs 3.1x for Calamos Strategic Total Return). Reaves Utility Income Fund offers the higher dividend yield (6.57% vs 2.99%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CSQ-0.39%UTG-1.12%
+0%-1%-1%
Oct 7, 20261 yearOct 8, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CSQ versus UTG key metrics
MetricCSQUTG
Share price$20.56$36.23
Market cap$3.30B$3.31B
1-day change+0.64%+0.10%
YTD return+6.41%—
1-year return+5.15%—
5-year return+11.82%—
P/E ratio (TTM)3.142.62
EPS (TTM)$6.55$13.80
Dividend yield2.99%6.57%
Annual dividend$0.615$2.38
52-week high$21.17$43.90
52-week low$16.41$33.53
Distance from 52-week high-2.88%-17.48%
Average volume184.94K311.84K
Shares outstanding160.37M91.43M
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryFinance CompaniesInvestment Managers

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Reaves Utility Income Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (6.57% vs 2.99%).

About Calamos Strategic Total Return

CSQ stock →

Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund is a closed ended balanced mutual fund launched by Calamos Investments LLC. The fund is managed by Calamos Advisors LLC.

Finance · Finance Companies

About Reaves Utility Income Fund

UTG stock →

Reaves Utility Income Fund is a closed ended balanced mutual fund launched and managed by W. H.

Finance · Investment Managers

CSQ vs UTG FAQ

Which is bigger, Calamos Strategic Total Return or Reaves Utility Income Fund?

Reaves Utility Income Fund (UTG) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.31B compared with $3.30B for Calamos Strategic Total Return (CSQ).

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CSQ or UTG?

UTG has the lower trailing P/E at 2.6, versus 3.1 for CSQ. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Calamos Strategic Total Return or Reaves Utility Income Fund?

Reaves Utility Income Fund has the higher yield at 6.57%, compared with 2.99% for Calamos Strategic Total Return.

Are Calamos Strategic Total Return and Reaves Utility Income Fund in the same industry?

Both are in the Finance sector, but in different industries: Finance Companies for Calamos Strategic Total Return and Investment Managers for Reaves Utility Income Fund.

More comparisons