MetaCap

Custom Truck One Source (CTOS) vs Korn Ferry (KFY)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Custom Truck One Source (CTOS) has outperformed Korn Ferry (KFY) over the past year, gaining 52.3% versus a loss of 0.1%. Over five years, CTOS leads with a +12.6% price change compared with -6.3% for KFY. Korn Ferry is the larger company by market cap ($4.04 billion vs $2.14 billion), about 1.9 times the size.

On valuation, Korn Ferry trades at a lower forward P/E (11.3x vs 30.3x for Custom Truck One Source). Korn Ferry pays a dividend yielding 2.85%, while Custom Truck One Source does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CTOS+52.26%KFY-0.13%
+99%+39%-21%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
CTOS+10.67%KFY-7.31%
+45%-11%-67%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CTOS versus KFY key metrics
MetricCTOSKFY
Share price$9.40$72.16
Market cap$2.14B$4.04B
1-day change-0.48%+2.31%
YTD return+63.89%+6.83%
1-year return+52.26%-0.13%
5-year return+12.65%-6.27%
P/E ratio (TTM)104.3913.64
Forward P/E30.3111.31
EPS (TTM)$0.09$5.29
Dividend yield0.00%2.85%
Annual dividend$0.00$2.06
Revenue (latest FY)—$2.94B
Revenue growth (YoY)—+6.43%
Net income (latest FY)—$277.43M
Operating margin—12.75%
Net margin—9.44%
52-week high$12.23$87.51
52-week low$5.18$58.95
Distance from 52-week high-23.18%-17.54%
Analyst consensusnonestrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+41.88%+25.07%
Average volume985.50K469.22K
Shares outstanding227.51M55.96M
Employees2,5008,965
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryDiversified Commercial ServicesDiversified Commercial Services

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • CTOS has outperformed KFY by 52.4 percentage points over the past year.
  • Custom Truck One Source trades at a higher earnings multiple (104.4x vs 13.6x trailing P/E).
  • Korn Ferry offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.85% vs 0.00%).

About Custom Truck One Source

CTOS stock →

Custom Truck One Source, Inc. provides specialty equipment rental and sale services to electric utility transmission and distribution, telecommunications, rail, forestry, waste management, and other infrastructure-related industries in the United States and Canada.

Consumer Discretionary · Diversified Commercial Services · 2,500 employees

About Korn Ferry

KFY stock →

Korn Ferry, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the provision of organizational consulting services worldwide. The company offers consulting services for talent strategies, organizational structures, and workforce capabilities; and develops, integrate, and commercializes with Korn Ferry Talent suite, as well as enabling technology across Korn Ferry's other solution areas.

Consumer Discretionary · Diversified Commercial Services · 8,965 employees

CTOS vs KFY FAQ

Which is bigger, Custom Truck One Source or Korn Ferry?

Korn Ferry (KFY) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.04B compared with $2.14B for Custom Truck One Source (CTOS).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CTOS or KFY?

CTOS returned +52.26% over the past 12 months, compared with -0.13% for KFY (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CTOS or KFY?

KFY has the lower trailing P/E at 13.6, versus 104.4 for CTOS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Custom Truck One Source or Korn Ferry?

Korn Ferry pays a dividend yielding 2.85%, while Custom Truck One Source does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Custom Truck One Source and Korn Ferry in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Diversified Commercial Services industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons