Centuri (CTRI) vs Kimbell Royalty Partners (KRP)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Kimbell Royalty Partners (KRP) has outperformed Centuri (CTRI) over the past year, gaining 12.7% versus a gain of 2.4%. Centuri is the larger company by market cap ($2.12 billion vs $1.96 billion), about 1.1 times the size. On valuation, Kimbell Royalty Partners trades at a lower forward P/E (14.8x vs 21.7x for Centuri).
Kimbell Royalty Partners pays a dividend yielding 10.46%, while Centuri does not currently pay one. Kimbell Royalty Partners converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 29.9% versus 0.8%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CTRI | KRP |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $20.98 | $15.29 |
| Market cap | $2.12B | $1.96B |
| 1-day change | +0.82% | +0.86% |
| YTD return | -17.58% | +28.91% |
| 1-year return | +2.36% | +12.71% |
| 5-year return | — | +1.34% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 63.58 | 17.99 |
| Forward P/E | 21.71 | 14.84 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.33 | $0.85 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 10.46% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1.60 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.98B | $333.83M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +13.10% | +7.93% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $22.39M | $99.65M |
| Gross margin | 8.27% | — |
| Operating margin | 3.11% | 39.79% |
| Net margin | 0.75% | 29.85% |
| 52-week high | $42.99 | $15.80 |
| 52-week low | $19.03 | $11.31 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -51.19% | -3.23% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +35.84% | +25.57% |
| Average volume | 1.83M | 889.07K |
| Shares outstanding | 100.96M | 100.90M |
| Employees | 9,687 | — |
| Sector | Utilities | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas Production | Oil & Gas Production |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- KRP has outperformed CTRI by 10.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Centuri trades at a higher earnings multiple (63.6x vs 18.0x trailing P/E).
- Kimbell Royalty Partners offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (10.46% vs 0.00%).
- Kimbell Royalty Partners is more profitable, keeping 29.9 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 0.8 cents for Centuri.
- Centuri grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+13.10% vs +7.93%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Centuri in Utilities and Kimbell Royalty Partners in Energy.
About Centuri
CTRI stock →Centuri Holdings, Inc. operates as a utility infrastructure services company in North America.
Utilities · Oil & Gas Production · 9,687 employees
About Kimbell Royalty Partners
KRP stock →Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP, together with its subsidiaries, owns and acquires mineral and royalty interests in oil and natural gas properties in the United States. The company was founded in 1998 and is based in Fort Worth, Texas.
Energy · Oil & Gas Production
CTRI vs KRP FAQ
Which is bigger, Centuri or Kimbell Royalty Partners?
Centuri (CTRI) is larger, with a market capitalization of $2.12B compared with $1.96B for Kimbell Royalty Partners (KRP).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CTRI or KRP?
KRP returned +12.71% over the past 12 months, compared with +2.36% for CTRI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CTRI or KRP?
KRP has the lower trailing P/E at 18.0, versus 63.6 for CTRI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Centuri or Kimbell Royalty Partners?
Kimbell Royalty Partners pays a dividend yielding 10.46%, while Centuri does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Centuri and Kimbell Royalty Partners in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas Production industry within the Utilities sector.