MetaCap

CTS (CTS) vs Universal Display (OLED)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

CTS (CTS) has outperformed Universal Display (OLED) over the past year, gaining 52.2% versus a loss of 45.0%. Over five years, CTS leads with a +92.9% price change compared with -56.3% for OLED. Universal Display is the larger company by market cap ($3.55 billion vs $1.66 billion), about 2.1 times the size.

On valuation, Universal Display trades at a lower forward P/E (16.2x vs 20.3x for CTS). Universal Display offers the higher dividend yield (2.46% vs 0.27%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

CTS+52.23%OLED-45.00%
+85%+15%-54%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
CTS+82.96%OLED-54.31%
+119%+28%-63%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

CTS versus OLED key metrics
MetricCTSOLED
Share price$58.29$77.22
Market cap$1.66B$3.55B
1-day change-4.60%-3.06%
YTD return+35.97%-33.88%
1-year return+52.23%-45.00%
5-year return+92.89%-56.33%
P/E ratio (TTM)24.3918.65
Forward P/E20.3316.22
EPS (TTM)$2.39$4.14
Dividend yield0.27%2.46%
Annual dividend$0.16$1.90
Revenue (latest FY)—$650.61M
Revenue growth (YoY)—+0.45%
Net income (latest FY)—$242.07M
Gross margin—76.31%
Operating margin—38.21%
Net margin—37.21%
52-week high$69.55$153.38
52-week low$36.03$73.23
Distance from 52-week high-16.19%-49.65%
Analyst consensusstrong_buynone
Avg. price target upside+21.24%+49.40%
Average volume211.56K736.38K
Shares outstanding28.56M45.97M
Employees3,492469
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryElectrical ProductsElectrical Products

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Universal Display is about 2.1 times larger than CTS by market value ($3.55B vs $1.66B).
  • CTS has outperformed OLED by 97.2 percentage points over the past year.
  • CTS trades at a higher earnings multiple (24.4x vs 18.7x trailing P/E).
  • Universal Display offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.46% vs 0.27%).

About CTS

CTS stock →

CTS Corporation designs, manufactures, and sells sensors, connectivity components, and actuators in North America, Europe, and Asia. The company offers controls, pedals, sensors, switches, transducers, and piezo sensing products; EMI/RFI filters, capacitors, resistors, RF filters, and frequency control products; and piezo microactuators and rotary actuators.

Technology · Electrical Products · 3,492 employees

About Universal Display

OLED stock →

Universal Display Corporation engages in the research, development, and commercialization of organic light emitting diode (OLED) technologies and materials for use in display and solid-state lighting applications. It offers phosphorescent organic light-emitting diode (PHOLED) technologies and materials for displays and lighting products under the UniversalPHOLED brand.

Technology · Electrical Products · 469 employees

CTS vs OLED FAQ

Which is bigger, CTS or Universal Display?

Universal Display (OLED) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.55B compared with $1.66B for CTS (CTS).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, CTS or OLED?

CTS returned +52.23% over the past 12 months, compared with -45.00% for OLED (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, CTS or OLED?

OLED has the lower trailing P/E at 18.7, versus 24.4 for CTS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, CTS or Universal Display?

Universal Display has the higher yield at 2.46%, compared with 0.27% for CTS.

Are CTS and Universal Display in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Electrical Products industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons