CVR Energy (CVI) vs Equinor ASA (EQNR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Equinor ASA (EQNR) has outperformed CVR Energy (CVI) over the past year, gaining 74.3% versus a gain of 62.0%. Over five years, CVI leads with a +195.2% price change compared with +52.7% for EQNR. Equinor ASA is the larger company by market cap ($101.71 billion vs $5.99 billion), about 17.0 times the size.
On valuation, Equinor ASA trades at a lower forward P/E (9.3x vs 17.0x for CVR Energy). Equinor ASA offers the higher dividend yield (3.59% vs 0.96%). Equinor ASA converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 4.7% versus 0.4%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CVI | EQNR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $59.54 | $42.93 |
| Market cap | $5.99B | $101.71B |
| 1-day change | +3.76% | +3.17% |
| YTD return | +134.04% | +81.68% |
| 1-year return | +61.97% | +74.30% |
| 5-year return | +195.19% | +52.70% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 87.56 | 11.73 |
| Forward P/E | 16.96 | 9.31 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.68 | $3.66 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 3.59% |
| Annual dividend | $0.57 | $1.54 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $7.16B | $106.46B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -5.89% | +2.59% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $27.00M | $5.04B |
| Gross margin | 4.83% | 48.18% |
| Operating margin | 2.54% | 23.81% |
| Net margin | 0.38% | 4.74% |
| 52-week high | $59.72 | $45.84 |
| 52-week low | $19.62 | $22.26 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -0.30% | -6.35% |
| Analyst consensus | underperform | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | -36.85% | -9.55% |
| Average volume | 1.03M | 3.48M |
| Shares outstanding | 100.53M | 2.37B |
| Employees | 1,532 | 23,545 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Integrated oil Companies | Integrated oil Companies |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Equinor ASA is about 17.0 times larger than CVR Energy by market value ($101.71B vs $5.99B).
- EQNR has outperformed CVI by 12.3 percentage points over the past year.
- CVR Energy trades at a higher earnings multiple (87.6x vs 11.7x trailing P/E).
- Equinor ASA offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.59% vs 0.96%).
- Equinor ASA grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+2.59% vs -5.89%).
About CVR Energy
CVI stock →CVR Energy, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in renewable fuels and petroleum refining and marketing, and nitrogen fertilizer manufacturing activities in the United States. It operates through three segments: Petroleum, Renewables, and Nitrogen Fertilizer.
Energy · Integrated oil Companies · 1,532 employees
About Equinor ASA
EQNR stock →Equinor ASA operates as an energy company in Norway and internationally. It operates through Exploration & Production Norway; Exploration & Production International; Exploration & Production USA; Marketing, Midstream & Processing; and Renewables segments.
Energy · Integrated oil Companies · 23,545 employees
CVI vs EQNR FAQ
Which is bigger, CVR Energy or Equinor ASA?
Equinor ASA (EQNR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $101.71B compared with $5.99B for CVR Energy (CVI).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CVI or EQNR?
EQNR returned +74.30% over the past 12 months, compared with +61.97% for CVI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CVI or EQNR?
EQNR has the lower trailing P/E at 11.7, versus 87.6 for CVI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, CVR Energy or Equinor ASA?
Equinor ASA has the higher yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.96% for CVR Energy.
Are CVR Energy and Equinor ASA in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Integrated oil Companies industry within the Energy sector.