Commvault Systems (CVLT) vs RingCentral (RNG)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
RingCentral (RNG) has outperformed Commvault Systems (CVLT) over the past year, gaining 189.2% versus a loss of 15.0%. Over five years, CVLT leads with a +100.1% price change compared with -66.7% for RNG. RingCentral is the larger company by market cap ($6.54 billion vs $6.26 billion), about 1.0 times the size, while Commvault Systems is growing revenue faster (+18.9% vs +4.8%).
On valuation, RingCentral trades at a lower forward P/E (14.0x vs 24.4x for Commvault Systems). RingCentral pays a dividend yielding 0.19%, while Commvault Systems does not currently pay one. Commvault Systems converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 6.0% versus 1.7%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | CVLT | RNG |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $151.00 | $78.35 |
| Market cap | $6.26B | $6.54B |
| 1-day change | +0.48% | +2.36% |
| YTD return | +20.45% | +171.30% |
| 1-year return | -15.03% | +189.22% |
| 5-year return | +100.08% | -66.71% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 96.18 | 62.68 |
| Forward P/E | 24.35 | 14.04 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.57 | $1.25 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.19% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.15 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.18B | $2.52B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +18.89% | +4.78% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $70.66M | $43.39M |
| Gross margin | 81.15% | 71.24% |
| Operating margin | 6.25% | 4.79% |
| Net margin | 5.97% | 1.73% |
| 52-week high | $178.36 | $81.90 |
| 52-week low | $71.75 | $24.14 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -15.34% | -4.33% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +7.50% | -26.43% |
| Average volume | 600.38K | 1.83M |
| Shares outstanding | 41.44M | 73.74M |
| Employees | 3,300 | 7,378 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Software - Application | EDP Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- RNG has outperformed CVLT by 204.2 percentage points over the past year.
- Commvault Systems trades at a higher earnings multiple (96.2x vs 62.7x trailing P/E).
- Commvault Systems grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+18.89% vs +4.78%).
About Commvault Systems
CVLT stock →Commvault Systems, Inc. provides cyber resiliency solutions for enterprises to protect, secure, and recover data, applications, and identity system.
Technology · Software - Application · 3,300 employees
About RingCentral
RNG stock →RingCentral, Inc., an agentic voice AIpowered cloud business communication services provider, delivering an integrated platform for business phone, SMS, contact center, workforce engagement management, video collaboration, and messaging. The company's products include RingEX, a AI-powered unified communications as a service platform for collaboration across voice, messaging, and video; RingCentral Contact Center, a contact center solution that delivers AI-powered omni-channel and workforce engagement solutions; RingCentral Customer Engagement Bundle, a comprehensive solution that includes phone, messaging, and SMS for businesses; and RingCX, a contact center as a service solution for AI-powered customer engagement with CRM integrations.
Technology · EDP Services · 7,378 employees
CVLT vs RNG FAQ
Which is bigger, Commvault Systems or RingCentral?
RingCentral (RNG) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.54B compared with $6.26B for Commvault Systems (CVLT).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, CVLT or RNG?
RNG returned +189.22% over the past 12 months, compared with -15.03% for CVLT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, CVLT or RNG?
RNG has the lower trailing P/E at 62.7, versus 96.2 for CVLT. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Commvault Systems or RingCentral?
RingCentral pays a dividend yielding 0.19%, while Commvault Systems does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Commvault Systems and RingCentral in the same industry?
Both are in the Technology sector, but in different industries: Software - Application for Commvault Systems and EDP Services for RingCentral.