Danaos (DAC) vs ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (ZIM)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (ZIM) has outperformed Danaos (DAC) over the past year, gaining 122.1% versus a gain of 88.3%. Over five years, DAC leads with a +134.8% price change compared with -31.7% for ZIM. On valuation, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services trades at a lower forward P/E (4.5x vs 6.8x for Danaos).
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services offers the higher dividend yield (3.95% vs 2.15%). Danaos converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 47.4% versus 6.9%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | DAC | ZIM |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $167.77 | $30.12 |
| Market cap | — | $3.63B |
| 1-day change | +2.00% | +0.43% |
| YTD return | +74.64% | +41.26% |
| 1-year return | +88.30% | +122.15% |
| 5-year return | +134.80% | -31.70% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 5.68 | 26.19 |
| Forward P/E | 6.85 | 4.50 |
| EPS (TTM) | $29.55 | $1.15 |
| Dividend yield | 2.15% | 3.95% |
| Annual dividend | $3.60 | $1.19 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.04B | $6.90B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +2.80% | -18.07% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $494.61M | $479.20M |
| Gross margin | — | 19.13% |
| Operating margin | 47.85% | 14.72% |
| Net margin | 47.45% | 6.94% |
| 52-week high | $169.18 | $30.96 |
| 52-week low | $83.56 | $12.33 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -0.83% | -2.71% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | -1.95% | -7.70% |
| Average volume | 128.82K | 1.59M |
| Shares outstanding | — | 120.52M |
| Employees | 4 | 4,714 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Marine Transportation | Marine Transportation |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- ZIM has outperformed DAC by 33.8 percentage points over the past year.
- ZIM Integrated Shipping Services trades at a higher earnings multiple (26.2x vs 5.7x trailing P/E).
- ZIM Integrated Shipping Services offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.95% vs 2.15%).
- Danaos is more profitable, keeping 47.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 6.9 cents for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.
- Danaos grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+2.80% vs -18.07%).
About Danaos
DAC stock →Danaos Corporation, through its subsidiaries, owns and operates containerships and drybulk vessels in Australia, Europe, and the United States. It operates in two segments, Container Vessels and Drybulk Vessels.
Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation · 4 employees
About ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
ZIM stock →ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd., together with its subsidiaries, provides container shipping and related services in Israel and internationally. The company offers door-to-door and port-to-port transportation services for various types of customers, including end-users, consolidators, and freight forwarders.
Consumer Discretionary · Marine Transportation · 4,714 employees
DAC vs ZIM FAQ
Which stock has performed better over the past year, DAC or ZIM?
ZIM returned +122.15% over the past 12 months, compared with +88.30% for DAC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, DAC or ZIM?
DAC has the lower trailing P/E at 5.7, versus 26.2 for ZIM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Danaos or ZIM Integrated Shipping Services?
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has the higher yield at 3.95%, compared with 2.15% for Danaos.
Are Danaos and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Marine Transportation industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.