Designer Brands (DBI) vs Fossil Group (FOSL)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.
Summary
Fossil Group (FOSL) has outperformed Designer Brands (DBI) over the past year, gaining 191.8% versus a gain of 73.8%. Over five years, FOSL leads with a -42.6% price change compared with -56.6% for DBI. Fossil Group is the larger company by market cap ($422.8 million vs $291.4 million), about 1.5 times the size.
On valuation, Designer Brands trades at a lower forward P/E (8.1x vs 55.0x for Fossil Group). Designer Brands pays a dividend yielding 3.51%, while Fossil Group does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | DBI | FOSL |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $5.70 | $7.15 |
| Market cap | $291.40M | $422.84M |
| 1-day change | -1.55% | +2.14% |
| YTD return | -23.28% | +90.16% |
| 1-year return | +73.78% | +191.84% |
| 5-year return | -56.59% | -42.62% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 19.66 | — |
| Forward P/E | 8.14 | 55.00 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.29 | $-1.27 |
| Dividend yield | 3.51% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.20 | $0.00 |
| 52-week high | $9.17 | $7.33 |
| 52-week low | $3.20 | $1.70 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -37.84% | -2.46% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +18.42% | +25.87% |
| Average volume | 572.36K | 886.64K |
| Shares outstanding | 43.39M | 59.14M |
| Employees | 13,000 | 4,500 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Clothing/Shoe/Accessory Stores | Consumer Specialties |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- FOSL has outperformed DBI by 118.1 percentage points over the past year.
- Designer Brands offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.51% vs 0.00%).
About Designer Brands
DBI stock →Designer Brands Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the design, production, and retailing of footwear and accessories in the United States, Canada, and internationally. It operates through two segments: Retail and Brand Portfolio.
Consumer Discretionary · Clothing/Shoe/Accessory Stores · 13,000 employees
About Fossil Group
FOSL stock →Fossil Group, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs, develops, markets, and distributes consumer fashion accessories in the United States, Europe, Asia, and internationally. The company's products include traditional watches, smartwatches, jewelry, handbags, small leather goods, belts, and sunglasses.
Consumer Discretionary · Consumer Specialties · 4,500 employees
DBI vs FOSL FAQ
Which is bigger, Designer Brands or Fossil Group?
Fossil Group (FOSL) is larger, with a market capitalization of $422.84M compared with $291.40M for Designer Brands (DBI).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, DBI or FOSL?
FOSL returned +191.84% over the past 12 months, compared with +73.78% for DBI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Designer Brands or Fossil Group?
Designer Brands pays a dividend yielding 3.51%, while Fossil Group does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Designer Brands and Fossil Group in the same industry?
Both are in the Consumer Discretionary sector, but in different industries: Clothing/Shoe/Accessory Stores for Designer Brands and Consumer Specialties for Fossil Group.