MetaCap

Quest Diagnostics (DGX) vs Natera (NTRA)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.

Summary

Natera (NTRA) has outperformed Quest Diagnostics (DGX) over the past year, gaining 127.1% versus a gain of 27.6%. Over five years, NTRA leads with a +252.8% price change compared with +62.0% for DGX. Natera is the larger company by market cap ($56.33 billion vs $25.48 billion), about 2.2 times the size.

Quest Diagnostics pays a dividend yielding 1.44%, while Natera does not currently pay one. Quest Diagnostics converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 9.0% versus -9.0%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

DGX+27.60%NTRA+127.08%
+155%+72%-12%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
DGX+62.62%NTRA+242.59%
+278%+96%-87%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

DGX versus NTRA key metrics
MetricDGXNTRA
Share price$230.81$390.79
Market cap$25.48B$56.33B
1-day change+1.65%-1.21%
YTD return+33.01%+70.58%
1-year return+27.60%+127.08%
5-year return+61.97%+252.79%
P/E ratio (TTM)24.50—
Forward P/E19.18—
EPS (TTM)$9.42$-1.35
Dividend yield1.44%0.00%
Annual dividend$3.32$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$11.04B$2.31B
Revenue growth (YoY)+11.78%+35.90%
Net income (latest FY)$992.00M$-208.16M
Gross margin33.21%—
Operating margin14.10%-13.44%
Net margin8.99%-9.03%
52-week high$248.84$437.41
52-week low$171.18$167.99
Distance from 52-week high-7.25%-10.66%
Analyst consensusbuystrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+7.48%-3.42%
Average volume1.04M1.45M
Shares outstanding110.37M144.14M
Employees46,0006,135
SectorHealth CareHealth Care
IndustryMedical SpecialitiesMedical Specialities

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Natera is about 2.2 times larger than Quest Diagnostics by market value ($56.33B vs $25.48B).
  • NTRA has outperformed DGX by 99.5 percentage points over the past year.
  • Quest Diagnostics offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.44% vs 0.00%).
  • Quest Diagnostics is more profitable, keeping 9.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -9.0 cents for Natera.
  • Natera grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+35.90% vs +11.78%).

About Quest Diagnostics

DGX stock →

Quest Diagnostics Incorporated provides diagnostic testing and services in the United States. The company develops and delivers diagnostic information services, such as routine, non-routine and advanced clinical testing, anatomic pathology testing, and other diagnostic information services.

Health Care · Medical Specialities · 46,000 employees

About Natera

NTRA stock →

Natera, Inc., a diagnostics company, engages in the development and commercialization of molecular testing services worldwide. It offers Signatera, a personalized ctDNA blood test for MRD assessment, early recurrence monitoring, and evaluation of treatment response in patients previously diagnosed with cancer; Latitude, a blood-based MRD test for colorectal cancer; Altera, a tissue based comprehensive genomic profiling test; and Empower, a hereditary cancer screening test.

Health Care · Medical Specialities · 6,135 employees

DGX vs NTRA FAQ

Which is bigger, Quest Diagnostics or Natera?

Natera (NTRA) is larger, with a market capitalization of $56.33B compared with $25.48B for Quest Diagnostics (DGX).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, DGX or NTRA?

NTRA returned +127.08% over the past 12 months, compared with +27.60% for DGX (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which pays a higher dividend, Quest Diagnostics or Natera?

Quest Diagnostics pays a dividend yielding 1.44%, while Natera does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Quest Diagnostics and Natera in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Medical Specialities industry within the Health Care sector.

More comparisons