DNOW (DNOW) vs Cactus (WHD)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Cactus (WHD) has outperformed DNOW (DNOW) over the past year, gaining 73.2% versus a loss of 1.0%. Over five years, DNOW leads with a +67.5% price change compared with +50.1% for WHD. Cactus is the larger company by market cap ($4.40 billion vs $2.78 billion), about 1.6 times the size, while DNOW is growing revenue faster (+18.8% vs -4.5%).
On valuation, Cactus trades at a lower forward P/E (17.3x vs 18.6x for DNOW). Cactus pays a dividend yielding 0.89%, while DNOW does not currently pay one. Cactus converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 15.4% versus -3.2%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | DNOW | WHD |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $15.36 | $63.10 |
| Market cap | $2.78B | $4.40B |
| 1-day change | -3.27% | -1.67% |
| YTD return | +15.92% | +38.13% |
| 1-year return | -0.97% | +73.16% |
| 5-year return | +67.50% | +50.13% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 53.93 |
| Forward P/E | 18.64 | 17.28 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-1.49 | $1.17 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.89% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.56 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.82B | $1.08B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +18.84% | -4.49% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-89.00M | $166.01M |
| Gross margin | 16.95% | 37.02% |
| Operating margin | -3.30% | 23.21% |
| Net margin | -3.16% | 15.39% |
| 52-week high | $17.26 | $74.07 |
| 52-week low | $10.94 | $33.20 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -11.01% | -14.81% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +22.07% | +11.28% |
| Average volume | 2.32M | 775.95K |
| Shares outstanding | 180.79M | 69.73M |
| Employees | 5,100 | 1,500 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Oil and Gas Field Machinery | Oil and Gas Field Machinery |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- WHD has outperformed DNOW by 74.1 percentage points over the past year.
- Cactus is more profitable, keeping 15.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -3.2 cents for DNOW.
- DNOW grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+18.84% vs -4.49%).
About DNOW
DNOW stock →DNOW Inc. distributes pipe, valves, fittings, and pumps in the United States, Canada, and internationally.
Consumer Discretionary · Oil and Gas Field Machinery · 5,100 employees
About Cactus
WHD stock →Cactus, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs, manufactures, sells, and rents engineered pressure control and spoolable pipe technologies in the United States, Australia, Canada, the Middle East, and internationally. The company operates in two segments: Pressure Control and Spoolable Technologies.
Consumer Discretionary · Oil and Gas Field Machinery · 1,500 employees
DNOW vs WHD FAQ
Which is bigger, DNOW or Cactus?
Cactus (WHD) is larger, with a market capitalization of $4.40B compared with $2.78B for DNOW (DNOW).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, DNOW or WHD?
WHD returned +73.16% over the past 12 months, compared with -0.97% for DNOW (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, DNOW or Cactus?
Cactus pays a dividend yielding 0.89%, while DNOW does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are DNOW and Cactus in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil and Gas Field Machinery industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.