DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL) vs Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) has outperformed DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL) over the past year, losing 8.9% versus a loss of 19.9%. Over five years, MUC leads with a -36.4% price change compared with -44.8% for DSL. Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund is the larger company by market cap ($1.20 billion vs $1.12 billion), about 1.1 times the size.
On valuation, Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (10.0x vs 30.6x for DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | DSL | MUC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $9.81 | $9.59 |
| Market cap | $1.12B | $1.20B |
| 1-day change | +0.05% | -1.79% |
| YTD return | -13.04% | -7.92% |
| 1-year return | -19.87% | -8.87% |
| 5-year return | -44.79% | -36.42% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 30.64 | 9.98 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.32 | $0.96 |
| Dividend yield | 13.47% | 6.66% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 52-week high | $12.34 | $11.16 |
| 52-week low | $9.73 | $9.51 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -20.54% | -14.11% |
| Average volume | 639.85K | 512.04K |
| Shares outstanding | 114.57M | 125.01M |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Trusts Except Educational Religious and Charitable | Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- MUC has outperformed DSL by 11.0 percentage points over the past year.
- DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (30.6x vs 10.0x trailing P/E).
- DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (13.47% vs 6.66%).
About DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund
DSL stock →DoubleLine Funds - DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund is a closed end fixed income mutual fund launched and managed by DoubleLine Capital LP. The fund invests in fixed income markets across the globe.
Finance · Trusts Except Educational Religious and Charitable
About Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
MUC stock →BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund, Inc. is a closed ended fixed income mutual fund launched by BlackRock, Inc.
Finance · Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service
DSL vs MUC FAQ
Which is bigger, DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund or Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund?
Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) is larger, with a market capitalization of $1.20B compared with $1.12B for DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund (DSL).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, DSL or MUC?
MUC returned -8.87% over the past 12 months, compared with -19.87% for DSL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, DSL or MUC?
MUC has the lower trailing P/E at 10.0, versus 30.6 for DSL. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund or Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund?
DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund has the higher yield at 13.47%, compared with 6.66% for Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund.
Are DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund and Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund in the same industry?
Both are in the Finance sector, but in different industries: Trusts Except Educational Religious and Charitable for DoubleLine Income Solutions Fund and Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service for Blackrock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund.