MetaCap

DexCom (DXCM) vs Glaukos (GKOS)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Glaukos (GKOS) has outperformed DexCom (DXCM) over the past year, gaining 84.1% versus a gain of 24.5%. Over five years, GKOS leads with a +284.2% price change compared with -38.0% for DXCM. DexCom is the larger company by market cap ($31.85 billion vs $9.51 billion), about 3.3 times the size, while Glaukos is growing revenue faster (+32.3% vs +15.6%).

On valuation, DexCom trades at a lower forward P/E (27.0x vs 308.1x for Glaukos). DexCom converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 17.9% versus -37.0%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

DXCM+24.54%GKOS+84.14%
+123%+49%-26%
Oct 8, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
DXCM-36.19%GKOS+281.27%
+328%+125%-77%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

DXCM versus GKOS key metrics
MetricDXCMGKOS
Share price$84.41$161.29
Market cap$31.85B$9.51B
1-day change+0.13%-6.32%
YTD return+27.18%+42.85%
1-year return+24.54%+84.14%
5-year return-37.99%+284.16%
P/E ratio (TTM)33.50—
Forward P/E26.99308.06
EPS (TTM)$2.52$-3.26
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$4.66B$507.44M
Revenue growth (YoY)+15.60%+32.33%
Net income (latest FY)$836.30M$-187.69M
Gross margin60.10%55.72%
Operating margin19.56%-39.33%
Net margin17.94%-36.99%
52-week high$92.59$191.62
52-week low$54.11$73.16
Distance from 52-week high-8.83%-15.83%
Analyst consensusstrong_buystrong_buy
Avg. price target upside+14.00%+23.19%
Average volume4.43M831.71K
Shares outstanding377.36M58.98M
Employees11,0001,094
SectorHealthcareHealthcare
IndustryMedical DevicesMedical Devices

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • DexCom is about 3.3 times larger than Glaukos by market value ($31.85B vs $9.51B).
  • GKOS has outperformed DXCM by 59.6 percentage points over the past year.
  • DexCom is more profitable, keeping 17.9 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -37.0 cents for Glaukos.
  • Glaukos grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+32.33% vs +15.60%).

About DexCom

DXCM stock →

DexCom, Inc., a medical device company, focuses on the design, development, and commercialization of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems for the management of diabetes and metabolic health in the United States and internationally. The company offers Dexcom G7 and G7 15 Day, an integrated continuous glucose monitoring system; Dexcom G6, a CGM system; Dexcom ONE+ to replace fingerstick blood glucose testing for diabetes treatment decisions; Stelo, a biosensor designed for adults with prediabetes and Type 2 diabetes who do not use insulin; Dexcom Share, a remote monitoring system; and Dexcom Follow application.

Healthcare · Medical Devices · 11,000 employees

About Glaukos

GKOS stock →

Glaukos Corporation, an ophthalmic pharmaceutical and medical technology company, develops therapies for the treatment of glaucoma, corneal disorders, and retinal diseases in the United States and internationally. It offers iStent and iStent inject W micro-bypass stents designed to treat mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma through the restoration of the natural physiologic outflow pathways for aqueous humor.

Healthcare · Medical Devices · 1,094 employees

DXCM vs GKOS FAQ

Which is bigger, DexCom or Glaukos?

DexCom (DXCM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $31.85B compared with $9.51B for Glaukos (GKOS).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, DXCM or GKOS?

GKOS returned +84.14% over the past 12 months, compared with +24.54% for DXCM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Are DexCom and Glaukos in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Medical Devices industry within the Healthcare sector.

More comparisons