Brinker International (EAT) vs Shake Shack (SHAK)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Brinker International (EAT) has outperformed Shake Shack (SHAK) over the past year, gaining 56.1% versus a loss of 27.1%. Over five years, EAT leads with a +300.1% price change compared with -10.8% for SHAK. Brinker International is the larger company by market cap ($8.12 billion vs $2.86 billion), about 2.8 times the size, while Shake Shack is growing revenue faster (+15.4% vs +7.9%).
On valuation, Brinker International trades at a lower forward P/E (13.3x vs 47.2x for Shake Shack). Brinker International converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 8.4% versus 3.2%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | EAT | SHAK |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $193.87 | $66.90 |
| Market cap | $8.12B | $2.86B |
| 1-day change | +1.93% | -0.61% |
| YTD return | +32.53% | -17.08% |
| 1-year return | +56.06% | -27.14% |
| 5-year return | +300.08% | -10.76% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 17.84 | 70.42 |
| Forward P/E | 13.32 | 47.17 |
| EPS (TTM) | $10.87 | $0.95 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $5.81B | $1.45B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +7.86% | +15.38% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $487.00M | $45.73M |
| Gross margin | 74.38% | — |
| Operating margin | 10.67% | 4.32% |
| Net margin | 8.39% | 3.16% |
| 52-week high | $254.99 | $107.46 |
| 52-week low | $100.30 | $51.60 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -23.97% | -37.74% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +35.45% | +20.64% |
| Average volume | 1.21M | 1.60M |
| Shares outstanding | 41.88M | 40.35M |
| Employees | 20,096 | 13,873 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Brinker International is about 2.8 times larger than Shake Shack by market value ($8.12B vs $2.86B).
- EAT has outperformed SHAK by 83.2 percentage points over the past year.
- Shake Shack trades at a higher earnings multiple (70.4x vs 17.8x trailing P/E).
- Brinker International is more profitable, keeping 8.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 3.2 cents for Shake Shack.
- Shake Shack grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+15.38% vs +7.86%).
About Brinker International
EAT stock →Brinker International, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the ownership, development, operation, and franchise of casual dining restaurants in the United States and internationally. It operates and franchises Chili's Grill & Bar and Maggiano's Little Italy restaurant brands.
Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants · 20,096 employees
About Shake Shack
SHAK stock →Shake Shack Inc. owns, operates, and licenses Shake Shack restaurants (Shacks) in the United States and internationally.
Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants · 13,873 employees
EAT vs SHAK FAQ
Which is bigger, Brinker International or Shake Shack?
Brinker International (EAT) is larger, with a market capitalization of $8.12B compared with $2.86B for Shake Shack (SHAK).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, EAT or SHAK?
EAT returned +56.06% over the past 12 months, compared with -27.14% for SHAK (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, EAT or SHAK?
EAT has the lower trailing P/E at 17.8, versus 70.4 for SHAK. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Are Brinker International and Shake Shack in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Restaurants industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.