BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term (ECAT) vs PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term (ECAT) has outperformed PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) over the past year, losing 14.9% versus a loss of 15.9%. Over five years, PDX leads with a +55.3% price change compared with -29.6% for ECAT. BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term is the larger company by market cap ($1.40 billion vs $922.3 million), about 1.5 times the size.
On valuation, BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term trades at a lower trailing P/E (5.6x vs 21.7x for PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ECAT | PDX |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $14.09 | $20.63 |
| Market cap | $1.40B | $922.30M |
| 1-day change | -0.35% | -1.01% |
| YTD return | -8.39% | +9.85% |
| 1-year return | -14.92% | -15.93% |
| 5-year return | -29.59% | +55.35% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 5.64 | 21.72 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.50 | $0.95 |
| Dividend yield | 22.52% | 8.90% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 52-week high | $16.70 | $24.44 |
| 52-week low | $13.36 | $18.47 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -15.63% | -15.59% |
| Average volume | 544.79K | 113.13K |
| Shares outstanding | 99.47M | 44.71M |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Finance/Investors Services | Finance/Investors Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (21.7x vs 5.6x trailing P/E).
- BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (22.52% vs 8.90%).
ECAT vs PDX FAQ
Which is bigger, BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term or PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund?
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term (ECAT) is larger, with a market capitalization of $1.40B compared with $922.30M for PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ECAT or PDX?
ECAT returned -14.92% over the past 12 months, compared with -15.93% for PDX (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, ECAT or PDX?
ECAT has the lower trailing P/E at 5.6, versus 21.7 for PDX. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term or PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund?
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term has the higher yield at 22.52%, compared with 8.90% for PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund.
Are BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term and PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Finance/Investors Services industry within the Finance sector.