MetaCap

Everus Construction Group (ECG) vs Toll Brothers (TOL)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Everus Construction Group (ECG) has outperformed Toll Brothers (TOL) over the past year, gaining 51.6% versus a gain of 0.8%. Toll Brothers is the larger company by market cap ($12.33 billion vs $6.39 billion), about 1.9 times the size, while Everus Construction Group is growing revenue faster (+31.5% vs +1.1%). On valuation, Toll Brothers trades at a lower forward P/E (9.7x vs 20.0x for Everus Construction Group).

Toll Brothers pays a dividend yielding 0.76%, while Everus Construction Group does not currently pay one. Toll Brothers converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 12.3% versus 5.4%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ECG+51.61%TOL+0.75%
+110%+49%-12%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
ECG+138.64%TOL-8.63%
+223%+87%-48%
Oct 28, 20245 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ECG versus TOL key metrics
MetricECGTOL
Share price$125.26$133.86
Market cap$6.39B$12.33B
1-day change-5.64%-3.00%
YTD return+46.40%-1.01%
1-year return+51.61%+0.75%
5-year return—+128.47%
P/E ratio (TTM)25.2010.79
Forward P/E20.019.69
EPS (TTM)$4.97$12.41
Dividend yield0.00%0.76%
Annual dividend$0.00$1.02
Revenue (latest FY)$3.75B$10.97B
Revenue growth (YoY)+31.47%+1.11%
Net income (latest FY)$201.77M$1.35B
Gross margin12.12%25.11%
Operating margin7.07%15.69%
Net margin5.39%12.28%
52-week high$171.58$168.36
52-week low$78.14$123.15
Distance from 52-week high-26.99%-20.49%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+40.51%+27.66%
Average volume504.99K971.85K
Shares outstanding51.04M92.15M
Employees9,4004,900
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryHomebuildingHomebuilding

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • ECG has outperformed TOL by 50.9 percentage points over the past year.
  • Everus Construction Group trades at a higher earnings multiple (25.2x vs 10.8x trailing P/E).
  • Toll Brothers is more profitable, keeping 12.3 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 5.4 cents for Everus Construction Group.
  • Everus Construction Group grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+31.47% vs +1.11%).

About Everus Construction Group

ECG stock →

Everus Construction Group, Inc. provides contracting services in the United States.

Consumer Discretionary · Homebuilding · 9,400 employees

About Toll Brothers

TOL stock →

Toll Brothers, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs, builds, markets, sells, and arranges finance for a range of detached and attached homes in luxury residential communities in the United States. It designs, builds, markets, and sells condominiums through Toll Brothers City Living.

Consumer Discretionary · Homebuilding · 4,900 employees

ECG vs TOL FAQ

Which is bigger, Everus Construction Group or Toll Brothers?

Toll Brothers (TOL) is larger, with a market capitalization of $12.33B compared with $6.39B for Everus Construction Group (ECG).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ECG or TOL?

ECG returned +51.61% over the past 12 months, compared with +0.75% for TOL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ECG or TOL?

TOL has the lower trailing P/E at 10.8, versus 25.2 for ECG. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Everus Construction Group or Toll Brothers?

Toll Brothers pays a dividend yielding 0.76%, while Everus Construction Group does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Everus Construction Group and Toll Brothers in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Homebuilding industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons