MetaCap

Consolidated Edison (ED) vs NiSource (NI)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Consolidated Edison (ED) has outperformed NiSource (NI) over the past year, gaining 4.6% versus a loss of 7.0%. Over five years, NI leads with a +62.9% price change compared with +40.5% for ED. Consolidated Edison is the larger company by market cap ($38.70 billion vs $19.44 billion), about 2.0 times the size, while NiSource is growing revenue faster (+23.5% vs +10.9%).

On valuation, Consolidated Edison trades at a lower forward P/E (16.1x vs 18.0x for NiSource). Consolidated Edison offers the higher dividend yield (3.32% vs 1.43%). NiSource converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 14.3% versus 12.0%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ED+4.60%NI-7.00%
+17%+2%-12%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
ED+42.43%NI+65.94%
+106%+50%-5%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ED versus NI key metrics
MetricEDNI
Share price$104.64$40.54
Market cap$38.70B$19.44B
1-day change-0.46%-0.32%
YTD return+5.36%-2.92%
1-year return+4.60%-7.00%
5-year return+40.51%+62.94%
P/E ratio (TTM)17.2421.56
Forward P/E16.1018.01
EPS (TTM)$6.07$1.88
Dividend yield3.32%1.43%
Annual dividend$3.48$0.58
Revenue (latest FY)$16.92B$6.52B
Revenue growth (YoY)+10.89%+23.47%
Net income (latest FY)$2.02B$929.50M
Gross margin—75.71%
Operating margin17.35%28.14%
Net margin11.96%14.25%
52-week high$116.23$49.21
52-week low$94.96$38.42
Distance from 52-week high-9.97%-17.62%
Analyst consensusholdbuy
Avg. price target upside+4.49%+21.19%
Average volume2.20M5.54M
Shares outstanding369.83M479.56M
Employees15,4077,668
SectorUtilitiesUtilities
IndustryPower GenerationPower Generation

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • ED has outperformed NI by 11.6 percentage points over the past year.
  • NiSource trades at a higher earnings multiple (21.6x vs 17.2x trailing P/E).
  • Consolidated Edison offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.32% vs 1.43%).
  • NiSource grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+23.47% vs +10.89%).

About Consolidated Edison

ED stock →

Consolidated Edison, Inc., through its subsidiaries, engages in the regulated electric, gas, and steam delivery businesses in the United States. The company offers electric services to approximately 3.7 million customers in New York City and Westchester County; gas to approximately 1.1 million customers in Manhattan, the Bronx, parts of Queens, and Westchester County; and steam to approximately 1,490 customers in parts of Manhattan.

Utilities · Power Generation · 15,407 employees

About NiSource

NI stock →

NiSource Inc., an energy holding company, operates as a regulated natural gas and electric utility company in the United States. It operates in two segments, Columbia Operations and NIPSCO Operations.

Utilities · Power Generation · 7,668 employees

ED vs NI FAQ

Which is bigger, Consolidated Edison or NiSource?

Consolidated Edison (ED) is larger, with a market capitalization of $38.70B compared with $19.44B for NiSource (NI).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ED or NI?

ED returned +4.60% over the past 12 months, compared with -7.00% for NI (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ED or NI?

ED has the lower trailing P/E at 17.2, versus 21.6 for NI. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Consolidated Edison or NiSource?

Consolidated Edison has the higher yield at 3.32%, compared with 1.43% for NiSource.

Are Consolidated Edison and NiSource in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Power Generation industry within the Utilities sector.

More comparisons