MetaCap

Eaton Vance Floating Rate Income (EFT) vs Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund (ETY)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

On valuation, Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (5.1x vs 42.5x for Eaton Vance Floating Rate Income). Eaton Vance Floating Rate Income offers the higher dividend yield (9.42% vs 8.37%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Head-to-head

EFT versus ETY key metrics
MetricEFTETY
Share price$10.62$14.22
1-day change-0.38%-0.35%
YTD return-5.93%—
1-year return-9.85%—
5-year return-29.06%—
P/E ratio (TTM)42.485.12
EPS (TTM)$0.25$2.78
Dividend yield9.42%8.37%
Annual dividend$1.00$1.19
52-week high$11.92$15.90
52-week low$10.31$13.12
Distance from 52-week high-10.91%-10.57%
Average volume112.86K300.92K
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryFinance CompaniesFinance Companies

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Eaton Vance Floating Rate Income trades at a higher earnings multiple (42.5x vs 5.1x trailing P/E).
  • Eaton Vance Floating Rate Income offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (9.42% vs 8.37%).

EFT vs ETY FAQ

Which has the lower P/E ratio, EFT or ETY?

ETY has the lower trailing P/E at 5.1, versus 42.5 for EFT. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Eaton Vance Floating Rate Income or Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund?

Eaton Vance Floating Rate Income has the higher yield at 9.42%, compared with 8.37% for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund.

Are Eaton Vance Floating Rate Income and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Finance Companies industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons