MetaCap

Enerflex (EFXT) vs Imax (IMAX)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Enerflex (EFXT) has outperformed Imax (IMAX) over the past year, gaining 104.6% versus a gain of 57.0%. Over five years, EFXT leads with a +170.4% price change compared with +151.8% for IMAX. Enerflex is the larger company by market cap ($2.89 billion vs $2.82 billion), about 1.0 times the size, while Imax is growing revenue faster (+16.5% vs +6.5%).

On valuation, Enerflex trades at a lower forward P/E (12.3x vs 24.4x for Imax). Enerflex pays a dividend yielding 0.51%, while Imax does not currently pay one. Imax converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 8.5% versus 2.5%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

EFXT+104.58%IMAX+57.00%
+153%+69%-15%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
EFXT+203.33%IMAX+141.78%
+272%+103%-66%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

EFXT versus IMAX key metrics
MetricEFXTIMAX
Share price$23.69$51.45
Market cap$2.89B$2.82B
1-day change-2.79%+1.72%
YTD return+53.53%+39.20%
1-year return+104.58%+57.00%
5-year return+170.43%+151.84%
P/E ratio (TTM)53.8470.48
Forward P/E12.3524.44
EPS (TTM)$0.44$0.73
Dividend yield0.51%0.00%
Annual dividend$0.122$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$2.57B$410.21M
Revenue growth (YoY)+6.50%+16.47%
Net income (latest FY)$64.00M$34.88M
Gross margin22.64%60.02%
Operating margin11.90%20.53%
Net margin2.49%8.50%
52-week high$29.15$57.73
52-week low$10.57$30.74
Distance from 52-week high-18.73%-10.88%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+32.97%+9.48%
Average volume635.25K1.25M
Shares outstanding122.10M54.84M
Employees4,554679
SectorIndustrialsConsumer Discretionary
IndustryIndustrial Machinery/ComponentsIndustrial Machinery/Components

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • EFXT has outperformed IMAX by 47.6 percentage points over the past year.
  • Imax trades at a higher earnings multiple (70.5x vs 53.8x trailing P/E).
  • Imax is more profitable, keeping 8.5 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 2.5 cents for Enerflex.
  • Imax grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+16.47% vs +6.50%).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: Enerflex in Industrials and Imax in Consumer Discretionary.

About Enerflex

EFXT stock →

Enerflex Ltd. offers modular natural gas, power technology, and treated water solutions in North America, Latin America, and the Eastern Hemisphere.

Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 4,554 employees

About Imax

IMAX stock →

IMAX Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a technology platform for entertainment and events in the United States, Canada, Greater China, rest of Asia, Western Europe, Latin America, and internationally. It operates through Content Solutions; and Technology Products and Services segments.

Consumer Discretionary · Industrial Machinery/Components · 679 employees

EFXT vs IMAX FAQ

Which is bigger, Enerflex or Imax?

Enerflex (EFXT) is larger, with a market capitalization of $2.89B compared with $2.82B for Imax (IMAX).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, EFXT or IMAX?

EFXT returned +104.58% over the past 12 months, compared with +57.00% for IMAX (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, EFXT or IMAX?

EFXT has the lower trailing P/E at 53.8, versus 70.5 for IMAX. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Enerflex or Imax?

Enerflex pays a dividend yielding 0.51%, while Imax does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Enerflex and Imax in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Industrials sector.

More comparisons