MetaCap

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund (EIM) vs abrdn Life Sciences Investors (HQL)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

On valuation, abrdn Life Sciences Investors trades at a lower trailing P/E (2.6x vs 37.9x for Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund). abrdn Life Sciences Investors offers the higher dividend yield (10.96% vs 7.00%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Head-to-head

EIM versus HQL key metrics
MetricEIMHQL
Share price$8.72$17.43
Market cap$447.97M—
1-day change+0.23%-0.74%
YTD return—+4.65%
1-year return—+11.21%
5-year return—-15.00%
P/E ratio (TTM)37.912.63
EPS (TTM)$0.23$6.64
Dividend yield7.00%10.96%
Annual dividend$0.61$1.91
52-week high$10.06$22.67
52-week low$8.64$15.66
Distance from 52-week high-13.32%-23.11%
Analyst consensusnone—
Average volume190.30K147.31K
Shares outstanding51.37M—
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryFinance/Investors ServicesInvestment Managers

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (37.9x vs 2.6x trailing P/E).
  • abrdn Life Sciences Investors offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (10.96% vs 7.00%).

About Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund

EIM stock →

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund is a closed ended fixed income mutual fund launched and managed by Eaton Vance Management. It invests primarily in high grade municipal obligations.

Finance · Finance/Investors Services

About abrdn Life Sciences Investors

HQL stock →

Abrdn Life Sciences Investors is a closed-ended equity mutual fund launched and managed by abrdn Inc. The fund invests in public equity markets across the globe.

Finance · Investment Managers

EIM vs HQL FAQ

Which has the lower P/E ratio, EIM or HQL?

HQL has the lower trailing P/E at 2.6, versus 37.9 for EIM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund or abrdn Life Sciences Investors?

abrdn Life Sciences Investors has the higher yield at 10.96%, compared with 7.00% for Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund.

Are Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund and abrdn Life Sciences Investors in the same industry?

Both are in the Finance sector, but in different industries: Finance/Investors Services for Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund and Investment Managers for abrdn Life Sciences Investors.

More comparisons