MetaCap

Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL) (ELPC) vs Korea Electric Power (KEP)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL) (ELPC) has outperformed Korea Electric Power (KEP) over the past year, gaining 58.8% versus a loss of 12.4%. Korea Electric Power is the larger company by market cap ($14.29 billion vs $10.36 billion), about 1.4 times the size. On valuation, Korea Electric Power trades at a lower forward P/E (3.9x vs 19.2x for Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL)).

Korea Electric Power offers the higher dividend yield (13854.45% vs 7.61%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ELPC+58.82%KEP-12.36%
+88%+34%-19%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
ELPC+77.38%KEP+53.52%
+222%+88%-47%
Dec 25, 20235 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ELPC versus KEP key metrics
MetricELPCKEP
Share price$13.96$11.13
Market cap$10.36B$14.29B
1-day change+0.50%-1.68%
YTD return+46.79%-32.55%
1-year return+58.82%-12.36%
5-year return—+14.74%
P/E ratio (TTM)17.232.64
Forward P/E19.233.95
EPS (TTM)$0.81$4.21
Dividend yield7.61%13854.45%
Annual dividend$1.06$1,542.00
52-week high$14.51$23.41
52-week low$8.26$10.78
Distance from 52-week high-3.79%-52.46%
Analyst consensusnonenone
Avg. price target upside+21.78%+34.77%
Average volume509.21K1.02M
Shares outstanding742.40M1.28B
Employees4,28722,693
SectorUtilitiesUtilities
IndustryElectric Utilities: CentralElectric Utilities: Central

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • ELPC has outperformed KEP by 71.2 percentage points over the past year.
  • Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL) trades at a higher earnings multiple (17.2x vs 2.6x trailing P/E).
  • Korea Electric Power offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (13854.45% vs 7.61%).

About Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL)

ELPC stock →

Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the research, study, planning, construction, production, transformation, transportation, distribution, and commercialization of electricity in Brazil. The company operates through three segments: Generation and Transmission of Electrical Energy; Electrical Energy Distribution; and Commercialization.

Utilities · Electric Utilities: Central · 4,287 employees

About Korea Electric Power

KEP stock →

Korea Electric Power Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity in South Korea and internationally. The company operates through five segments: Electricity Sales, Nuclear Power Generation, Thermal Power Generation, Power Support, and Other.

Utilities · Electric Utilities: Central · 22,693 employees

ELPC vs KEP FAQ

Which is bigger, Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL) or Korea Electric Power?

Korea Electric Power (KEP) is larger, with a market capitalization of $14.29B compared with $10.36B for Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL) (ELPC).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ELPC or KEP?

ELPC returned +58.82% over the past 12 months, compared with -12.36% for KEP (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ELPC or KEP?

KEP has the lower trailing P/E at 2.6, versus 17.2 for ELPC. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL) or Korea Electric Power?

Korea Electric Power has the higher yield at 13854.45%, compared with 7.61% for Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL).

Are Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL) and Korea Electric Power in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Electric Utilities: Central industry within the Utilities sector.

More comparisons