Emera (EMA) vs Alliant Energy (LNT)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Alliant Energy (LNT) has outperformed Emera (EMA) over the past year, losing 4.2% versus a loss of 4.5%. Over five years, LNT leads with a +16.9% price change compared with -3.2% for EMA. Alliant Energy is the larger company by market cap ($16.98 billion vs $14.08 billion), about 1.2 times the size.
On valuation, Emera trades at a lower forward P/E (17.7x vs 17.8x for Alliant Energy). Emera offers the higher dividend yield (6.38% vs 3.18%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | EMA | LNT |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $45.85 | $65.50 |
| Market cap | $14.08B | $16.98B |
| 1-day change | +0.09% | +0.44% |
| YTD return | -6.88% | +0.31% |
| 1-year return | -4.54% | -4.20% |
| 5-year return | -3.17% | +16.93% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 20.02 | 20.73 |
| Forward P/E | 17.72 | 17.76 |
| EPS (TTM) | $2.29 | $3.16 |
| Dividend yield | 6.38% | 3.18% |
| Annual dividend | $2.92 | $2.09 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $4.36B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | +9.57% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $810.00M |
| Gross margin | — | 85.67% |
| Operating margin | — | 23.50% |
| Net margin | — | 18.57% |
| 52-week high | $55.49 | $78.81 |
| 52-week low | $45.40 | $62.54 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -17.37% | -16.89% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +15.59% | +18.14% |
| Average volume | 531.06K | 2.55M |
| Shares outstanding | 307.15M | 259.28M |
| Employees | 7,812 | 2,948 |
| Sector | Utilities | Utilities |
| Industry | Electric Utilities: Central | Power Generation |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Emera offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (6.38% vs 3.18%).
About Emera
EMA stock →Emera Incorporated, an energy and services company, invests in generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity in the United States, Canada, Barbados, and the Bahamas. The company operates through Florida Electric Utility, Canadian Electric Utilities, Gas Utilities and Infrastructure, Other Electric Utilities, and Other segments.
Utilities · Electric Utilities: Central · 7,812 employees
About Alliant Energy
LNT stock →Alliant Energy Corporation operates as a utility holding company that provides regulated electric and natural gas services in the United States. It operates through IPL and WPL segments.
Utilities · Power Generation · 2,948 employees
EMA vs LNT FAQ
Which is bigger, Emera or Alliant Energy?
Alliant Energy (LNT) is larger, with a market capitalization of $16.98B compared with $14.08B for Emera (EMA).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, EMA or LNT?
LNT returned -4.20% over the past 12 months, compared with -4.54% for EMA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, EMA or LNT?
EMA has the lower trailing P/E at 20.0, versus 20.7 for LNT. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Emera or Alliant Energy?
Emera has the higher yield at 6.38%, compared with 3.18% for Alliant Energy.
Are Emera and Alliant Energy in the same industry?
Both are in the Utilities sector, but in different industries: Electric Utilities: Central for Emera and Power Generation for Alliant Energy.