MetaCap

EnerSys (ENS) vs JBT Marel (JBTM)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

EnerSys (ENS) has outperformed JBT Marel (JBTM) over the past year, gaining 56.5% versus a loss of 27.3%. Over five years, ENS leads with a +128.0% price change compared with -30.2% for JBTM. EnerSys is the larger company by market cap ($6.47 billion vs $5.47 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while JBT Marel is growing revenue faster (+121.3% vs +3.7%).

On valuation, JBT Marel trades at a lower forward P/E (11.4x vs 12.5x for EnerSys). EnerSys offers the higher dividend yield (0.59% vs 0.38%). EnerSys converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 7.8% versus -1.3%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ENS+58.51%JBTM-26.48%
+122%+44%-34%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 8, 2026
ENS+136.65%JBTM-28.73%
+226%+85%-56%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ENS versus JBTM key metrics
MetricENSJBTM
Share price$179.31$105.36
Market cap$6.47B$5.47B
1-day change-1.74%+0.99%
YTD return+22.19%-30.07%
1-year return+56.49%-27.34%
5-year return+128.01%-30.24%
P/E ratio (TTM)19.2028.55
Forward P/E12.4711.42
EPS (TTM)$9.34$3.69
Dividend yield0.59%0.38%
Annual dividend$1.05$0.40
Revenue (latest FY)$3.75B$3.80B
Revenue growth (YoY)+3.70%+121.34%
Net income (latest FY)$293.56M$-50.50M
Gross margin29.26%35.14%
Operating margin11.37%4.99%
Net margin7.83%-1.33%
52-week high$244.30$170.19
52-week low$108.88$103.26
Distance from 52-week high-26.60%-38.09%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+39.13%+58.56%
Average volume516.89K565.79K
Shares outstanding36.07M51.88M
Employees9,68211,500
SectorMiscellaneousIndustrials
IndustryIndustrial Machinery/ComponentsIndustrial Machinery/Components

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • ENS has outperformed JBTM by 83.8 percentage points over the past year.
  • JBT Marel trades at a higher earnings multiple (28.6x vs 19.2x trailing P/E).
  • EnerSys is more profitable, keeping 7.8 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -1.3 cents for JBT Marel.
  • JBT Marel grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+121.34% vs +3.70%).
  • The two companies sit in different sectors: EnerSys in Miscellaneous and JBT Marel in Industrials.

About EnerSys

ENS stock →

EnerSys engages in the provision of stored energy solutions for industrial applications worldwide. It operates through three segments: Network & Infrastructure Solutions, Industrial Mobility Solutions, and Precision Power Solutions.

Miscellaneous · Industrial Machinery/Components · 9,682 employees

About JBT Marel

JBTM stock →

JBT Marel Corporation provides technology solutions to food and beverage industry in the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the Asia Pacific, and Latin America. The company operates through Protein Solutions and Prepared Food and Beverage Solutions.

Industrials · Industrial Machinery/Components · 11,500 employees

ENS vs JBTM FAQ

Which is bigger, EnerSys or JBT Marel?

EnerSys (ENS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.47B compared with $5.47B for JBT Marel (JBTM).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ENS or JBTM?

ENS returned +56.49% over the past 12 months, compared with -27.34% for JBTM (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ENS or JBTM?

ENS has the lower trailing P/E at 19.2, versus 28.6 for JBTM. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, EnerSys or JBT Marel?

EnerSys has the higher yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.38% for JBT Marel.

Are EnerSys and JBT Marel in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry within the Miscellaneous sector.

More comparisons