MetaCap

Equinix (EQIX) vs Lamar Advertising (LAMR)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

Equinix (EQIX) has outperformed Lamar Advertising (LAMR) over the past year, gaining 31.1% versus a gain of 17.9%. Over five years, EQIX leads with a +32.0% price change compared with +20.2% for LAMR. Equinix is the larger company by market cap ($99.88 billion vs $14.55 billion), about 6.9 times the size.

On valuation, Lamar Advertising trades at a lower forward P/E (22.1x vs 54.6x for Equinix). Lamar Advertising offers the higher dividend yield (4.40% vs 1.95%). Lamar Advertising converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 25.9% versus 14.6%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

EQIX+31.09%LAMR+17.92%
+44%+17%-10%
Oct 7, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
EQIX+37.39%LAMR+22.57%
+52%+7%-37%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

EQIX versus LAMR key metrics
MetricEQIXLAMR
Share price$1,012.26$143.29
Market cap$99.88B$14.55B
1-day change-1.89%+0.03%
YTD return+34.67%+13.16%
1-year return+31.09%+17.92%
5-year return+32.04%+20.24%
P/E ratio (TTM)65.1426.15
Forward P/E54.6422.11
EPS (TTM)$15.54$5.48
Dividend yield1.95%4.40%
Annual dividend$19.70$6.30
Revenue (latest FY)$9.22B$2.27B
Revenue growth (YoY)+5.36%+2.68%
Net income (latest FY)$1.35B$587.15M
Gross margin51.09%67.04%
Operating margin20.05%34.16%
Net margin14.65%25.91%
52-week high$1,128.68$166.33
52-week low$720.62$114.45
Distance from 52-week high-10.31%-13.85%
Analyst consensusstrong_buyhold
Avg. price target upside+21.92%+13.20%
Average volume535.83K579.99K
Shares outstanding98.67M87.13M
Employees13,7163,500
SectorReal EstateReal Estate
IndustryReal Estate Investment TrustsReal Estate Investment Trusts

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Equinix is about 6.9 times larger than Lamar Advertising by market value ($99.88B vs $14.55B).
  • EQIX has outperformed LAMR by 13.2 percentage points over the past year.
  • Equinix trades at a higher earnings multiple (65.1x vs 26.1x trailing P/E).
  • Lamar Advertising offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (4.40% vs 1.95%).
  • Lamar Advertising is more profitable, keeping 25.9 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 14.6 cents for Equinix.

About Equinix

EQIX stock →

Equinix, Inc. shortens the path to boundless connectivity anywhere in the world.

Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 13,716 employees

About Lamar Advertising

LAMR stock →

Lamar Advertising Company is one of the largest outdoor advertising companies in North America, with over 362,000 displays across the United States and Canada. Lamar offers advertisers a variety of billboards, interstate logo, transit and airport advertising formats, helping both local businesses and national brands reach broad audiences every day.

Real Estate · Real Estate Investment Trusts · 3,500 employees

EQIX vs LAMR FAQ

Which is bigger, Equinix or Lamar Advertising?

Equinix (EQIX) is larger, with a market capitalization of $99.88B compared with $14.55B for Lamar Advertising (LAMR).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, EQIX or LAMR?

EQIX returned +31.09% over the past 12 months, compared with +17.92% for LAMR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, EQIX or LAMR?

LAMR has the lower trailing P/E at 26.1, versus 65.1 for EQIX. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Equinix or Lamar Advertising?

Lamar Advertising has the higher yield at 4.40%, compared with 1.95% for Equinix.

Are Equinix and Lamar Advertising in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry within the Real Estate sector.

More comparisons