MetaCap

Ericsson (ERIC) vs Nokia Sponsored (NOK)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

Nokia Sponsored (NOK) has outperformed Ericsson (ERIC) over the past year, gaining 109.9% versus a gain of 12.2%. Over five years, NOK leads with a +80.3% price change compared with -22.3% for ERIC. Nokia Sponsored is the larger company by market cap ($59.46 billion vs $30.78 billion), about 1.9 times the size.

On valuation, Ericsson trades at a lower forward P/E (15.4x vs 22.0x for Nokia Sponsored). Nokia Sponsored pays a dividend yielding 1.32%, while Ericsson does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

ERIC+12.35%NOK+114.95%
+253%+119%-15%
Oct 6, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
ERIC-18.94%NOK+83.45%
+178%+52%-74%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

ERIC versus NOK key metrics
MetricERICNOK
Share price$9.46$10.62
Market cap$30.78B$59.46B
1-day change+0.32%-3.19%
YTD return-1.97%+64.45%
1-year return+12.22%+109.86%
5-year return-22.33%+80.34%
P/E ratio (TTM)11.9775.86
Forward P/E15.4422.00
EPS (TTM)$0.79$0.14
Dividend yield3.39%1.32%
Annual dividend$0.00$0.14
52-week high$13.77$17.45
52-week low$8.12$5.09
Distance from 52-week high-31.30%-39.14%
Analyst consensusunderperformstrong_buy
Avg. price target upside-1.37%+40.96%
Average volume11.03M83.98M
Shares outstanding2.99B5.60B
Employees86,53678,005
SectorTechnologyTechnology
IndustryRadio And Television Broadcasting And Communications EquipmentRadio And Television Broadcasting And Communications Equipment

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • NOK has outperformed ERIC by 97.6 percentage points over the past year.
  • Nokia Sponsored trades at a higher earnings multiple (75.9x vs 12.0x trailing P/E).
  • Ericsson offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.39% vs 1.32%).

About Ericsson

ERIC stock →

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ), together with its subsidiaries, provides mobile connectivity solutions to communications service providers, enterprises, and the public sector in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Northeast Asia, Southeast Asia, Oceania, and India. It operates through Networks; Cloud Software and Services; Enterprise; and Other segments.

Technology · Radio And Television Broadcasting And Communications Equipment · 86,536 employees

About Nokia Sponsored

NOK stock →

Nokia Oyj, together with its subsidiaries, provides mobile, fixed, and cloud network solutions in North and Latin America, Greater China, India, Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. It operates in four segments: Network Infrastructure, Mobile Networks, Cloud and Network Services, and Nokia Technologies.

Technology · Radio And Television Broadcasting And Communications Equipment · 78,005 employees

ERIC vs NOK FAQ

Which is bigger, Ericsson or Nokia Sponsored?

Nokia Sponsored (NOK) is larger, with a market capitalization of $59.46B compared with $30.78B for Ericsson (ERIC).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, ERIC or NOK?

NOK returned +109.86% over the past 12 months, compared with +12.22% for ERIC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, ERIC or NOK?

ERIC has the lower trailing P/E at 12.0, versus 75.9 for NOK. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Ericsson or Nokia Sponsored?

Ericsson has the higher yield at 3.39%, compared with 1.32% for Nokia Sponsored.

Are Ericsson and Nokia Sponsored in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Radio And Television Broadcasting And Communications Equipment industry within the Technology sector.

More comparisons