ESCO Technologies (ESE) vs Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS (TKC)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
ESCO Technologies (ESE) has outperformed Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS (TKC) over the past year, gaining 22.8% versus a loss of 15.8%. Over five years, ESE leads with a +204.0% price change compared with +21.9% for TKC. ESCO Technologies is the larger company by market cap ($6.66 billion vs $4.46 billion), about 1.5 times the size.
On valuation, Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS trades at a lower forward P/E (9.7x vs 27.8x for ESCO Technologies). ESCO Technologies pays a dividend yielding 0.12%, while Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | ESE | TKC |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $256.90 | $5.12 |
| Market cap | $6.66B | $4.46B |
| 1-day change | -4.22% | -0.97% |
| YTD return | +31.48% | -6.40% |
| 1-year return | +22.81% | -15.79% |
| 5-year return | +203.99% | +21.90% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 47.66 | 9.66 |
| Forward P/E | 27.85 | 9.66 |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.39 | $0.53 |
| Dividend yield | 0.12% | 2.07% |
| Annual dividend | $0.32 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.10B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +19.18% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $299.22M | — |
| Gross margin | 42.09% | — |
| Operating margin | 15.55% | — |
| Net margin | 27.32% | — |
| 52-week high | $362.15 | $7.18 |
| 52-week low | $193.68 | $4.82 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -29.06% | -28.69% |
| Analyst consensus | none | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +52.10% | +41.99% |
| Average volume | 215.88K | 2.30M |
| Shares outstanding | 25.91M | 870.58M |
| Employees | 3,359 | — |
| Sector | Telecommunications | Telecommunications |
| Industry | Telecommunications Equipment | Telecommunications Equipment |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- ESE has outperformed TKC by 38.6 percentage points over the past year.
- ESCO Technologies trades at a higher earnings multiple (47.7x vs 9.7x trailing P/E).
- Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.07% vs 0.12%).
About ESCO Technologies
ESE stock →ESCO Technologies Inc. provides engineered components and systems for aviation, navy, defense, and industrial customers.
Telecommunications · Telecommunications Equipment · 3,359 employees
About Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS
TKC stock →Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S., together with its subsidiaries, engages in establishing and operating a global system for mobile communications (GSM) network in Turkey, Belarus, Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, Germany, and the Netherlands. It operates through the Turkcell Turkiye, Turkcell International, and Techfin segments.
Telecommunications · Telecommunications Equipment
ESE vs TKC FAQ
Which is bigger, ESCO Technologies or Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS?
ESCO Technologies (ESE) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.66B compared with $4.46B for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS (TKC).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, ESE or TKC?
ESE returned +22.81% over the past 12 months, compared with -15.79% for TKC (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, ESE or TKC?
TKC has the lower trailing P/E at 9.7, versus 47.7 for ESE. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, ESCO Technologies or Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS?
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS has the higher yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.12% for ESCO Technologies.
Are ESCO Technologies and Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Telecommunications Equipment industry within the Telecommunications sector.