Evercore (EVR) vs Hamilton Lane (HLNE)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
Evercore (EVR) has outperformed Hamilton Lane (HLNE) over the past year, losing 17.6% versus a loss of 30.5%. Over five years, EVR leads with a +73.0% price change compared with -6.6% for HLNE. Evercore is the larger company by market cap ($10.26 billion vs $5.74 billion), about 1.8 times the size.
On valuation, Hamilton Lane trades at a lower forward P/E (11.6x vs 12.4x for Evercore). Hamilton Lane offers the higher dividend yield (2.59% vs 1.30%). Hamilton Lane converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 32.8% versus 15.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | EVR | HLNE |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $266.75 | $85.66 |
| Market cap | $10.26B | $5.74B |
| 1-day change | -0.19% | +0.54% |
| YTD return | -21.45% | -36.56% |
| 1-year return | -17.55% | -30.51% |
| 5-year return | +73.02% | -6.57% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 15.02 | 13.06 |
| Forward P/E | 12.37 | 11.63 |
| EPS (TTM) | $17.76 | $6.56 |
| Dividend yield | 1.30% | 2.59% |
| Annual dividend | $3.46 | $2.22 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.88B | $758.99M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +29.49% | +6.46% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $591.92M | $249.18M |
| Net margin | 15.26% | 32.83% |
| 52-week high | $388.71 | $155.66 |
| 52-week low | $251.13 | $71.88 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -31.38% | -44.97% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +29.45% | +51.04% |
| Average volume | 513.07K | 661.23K |
| Shares outstanding | 38.46M | 43.35M |
| Employees | 2,715 | 800 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Investment Managers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- EVR has outperformed HLNE by 13.0 percentage points over the past year.
- Hamilton Lane offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.59% vs 1.30%).
- Hamilton Lane is more profitable, keeping 32.8 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 15.3 cents for Evercore.
- Evercore grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+29.49% vs +6.46%).
About Evercore
EVR stock →Evercore Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as an independent investment banking firm in the Americas, Europe, Middle East, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. The company operates through two segments, Investment Banking & Equities, and Investment Management.
Finance · Investment Managers · 2,715 employees
About Hamilton Lane
HLNE stock →Hamilton Lane Incorporated is a private equity and venture capital firm specializing in early venture, emerging growth, turnaround, middle market, mature, mid-venture, bridge, buyout, distressed/vulture, loan, mezzanine in growth capital companies. The firm manages alternative investment strategies like direct credit, direct, fund of fund, evergreen and real assets.
Finance · Investment Managers · 800 employees
EVR vs HLNE FAQ
Which is bigger, Evercore or Hamilton Lane?
Evercore (EVR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $10.26B compared with $5.74B for Hamilton Lane (HLNE).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, EVR or HLNE?
EVR returned -17.55% over the past 12 months, compared with -30.51% for HLNE (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, EVR or HLNE?
HLNE has the lower trailing P/E at 13.1, versus 15.0 for EVR. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Evercore or Hamilton Lane?
Hamilton Lane has the higher yield at 2.59%, compared with 1.30% for Evercore.
Are Evercore and Hamilton Lane in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.