MetaCap

Eaton Vance Duration Income Fund (EVV) vs Neuberger Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund (NML)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.

Summary

On valuation, Neuberger Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund trades at a lower trailing P/E (4.1x vs 13.5x for Eaton Vance Duration Income Fund). Eaton Vance Duration Income Fund pays a dividend yielding 10.49%, while Neuberger Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund does not currently pay one.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Head-to-head

EVV versus NML key metrics
MetricEVVNML
Share price$8.36$10.08
Market cap—$571.12M
1-day change-0.83%-2.42%
P/E ratio (TTM)13.484.13
EPS (TTM)$0.62$2.44
Dividend yield10.49%8.34%
Annual dividend$0.877$0.00
52-week high$10.23$10.98
52-week low$8.31$7.89
Distance from 52-week high-18.28%-8.20%
Average volume552.43K137.56K
Shares outstanding—56.66M
SectorFinanceFinance
IndustryFinance/Investors ServicesFinance/Investors Services

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Eaton Vance Duration Income Fund trades at a higher earnings multiple (13.5x vs 4.1x trailing P/E).
  • Eaton Vance Duration Income Fund offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (10.49% vs 8.34%).

EVV vs NML FAQ

Which has the lower P/E ratio, EVV or NML?

NML has the lower trailing P/E at 4.1, versus 13.5 for EVV. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Eaton Vance Duration Income Fund or Neuberger Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund?

Eaton Vance Duration Income Fund has the higher yield at 10.49%, compared with 8.34% for Neuberger Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund.

Are Eaton Vance Duration Income Fund and Neuberger Energy Infrastructure and Income Fund in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Finance/Investors Services industry within the Finance sector.

More comparisons