MetaCap

Exponent (EXPO) vs Huron Consulting Group (HURN)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.

Summary

Huron Consulting Group (HURN) has outperformed Exponent (EXPO) over the past year, gaining 13.3% versus a gain of 6.9%. Over five years, HURN leads with a +225.6% price change compared with -37.1% for EXPO. Exponent is the larger company by market cap ($3.32 billion vs $2.66 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while Huron Consulting Group is growing revenue faster (+11.7% vs +4.2%).

On valuation, Huron Consulting Group trades at a lower forward P/E (15.8x vs 25.7x for Exponent). Exponent pays a dividend yielding 1.75%, while Huron Consulting Group does not currently pay one. Exponent converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 18.2% versus 6.2%.

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

EXPO+6.94%HURN+13.25%
+29%-7%-42%
Oct 9, 20251 yearOct 9, 2026
EXPO-39.05%HURN+232.17%
+281%+106%-69%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

EXPO versus HURN key metrics
MetricEXPOHURN
Share price$69.81$167.05
Market cap$3.32B$2.66B
1-day change+0.04%+1.05%
YTD return+0.50%-3.39%
1-year return+6.94%+13.25%
5-year return-37.06%+225.63%
P/E ratio (TTM)31.3024.90
Forward P/E25.6615.77
EPS (TTM)$2.23$6.71
Dividend yield1.75%0.00%
Annual dividend$1.22$0.00
Revenue (latest FY)$582.01M$1.70B
Revenue growth (YoY)+4.21%+11.65%
Net income (latest FY)$106.01M$105.04M
Gross margin—33.94%
Operating margin20.58%10.51%
Net margin18.21%6.18%
52-week high$81.95$186.78
52-week low$51.91$84.88
Distance from 52-week high-14.81%-10.56%
Analyst consensusbuynone
Avg. price target upside+20.33%+14.19%
Average volume516.69K280.69K
Shares outstanding47.55M15.91M
Employees1,0129,248
SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
IndustryProfessional ServicesProfessional Services

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Exponent trades at a higher earnings multiple (31.3x vs 24.9x trailing P/E).
  • Exponent offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.75% vs 0.00%).
  • Exponent is more profitable, keeping 18.2 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 6.2 cents for Huron Consulting Group.
  • Huron Consulting Group grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+11.65% vs +4.21%).

About Exponent

EXPO stock →

Exponent, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as a science and engineering consulting company in the United States and internationally. The company operates in two segments, Engineering and Other Scientific, and Environmental and Health.

Consumer Discretionary · Professional Services · 1,012 employees

About Huron Consulting Group

HURN stock →

Huron Consulting Group Inc. provides global professional services in the United States and internationally.

Consumer Discretionary · Professional Services · 9,248 employees

EXPO vs HURN FAQ

Which is bigger, Exponent or Huron Consulting Group?

Exponent (EXPO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.32B compared with $2.66B for Huron Consulting Group (HURN).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, EXPO or HURN?

HURN returned +13.25% over the past 12 months, compared with +6.94% for EXPO (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, EXPO or HURN?

HURN has the lower trailing P/E at 24.9, versus 31.3 for EXPO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Exponent or Huron Consulting Group?

Exponent pays a dividend yielding 1.75%, while Huron Consulting Group does not currently pay a regular dividend.

Are Exponent and Huron Consulting Group in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Professional Services industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.

More comparisons