Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs Vitesse Energy (VTS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Diamondback Energy (FANG) has outperformed Vitesse Energy (VTS) over the past year, gaining 28.6% versus a loss of 26.3%. Diamondback Energy is the larger company by market cap ($53.67 billion vs $722.9 million), about 74.2 times the size. On valuation, Diamondback Energy trades at a lower forward P/E (10.2x vs 36.1x for Vitesse Energy).
Vitesse Energy offers the higher dividend yield (11.65% vs 2.22%).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FANG | VTS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $191.68 | $17.17 |
| Market cap | $53.67B | $722.93M |
| 1-day change | +3.96% | +0.82% |
| YTD return | +27.51% | -10.85% |
| 1-year return | +28.58% | -26.28% |
| 5-year return | +77.02% | — |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 36.51 | — |
| Forward P/E | 10.23 | 36.15 |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.25 | $-0.28 |
| Dividend yield | 2.22% | 11.65% |
| Annual dividend | $4.25 | $2.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $15.03B | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +35.79% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.66B | — |
| Operating margin | 8.43% | — |
| Net margin | 11.07% | — |
| 52-week high | $216.90 | $22.97 |
| 52-week low | $137.03 | $15.00 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -11.63% | -25.23% |
| Analyst consensus | strong_buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +22.42% | +25.22% |
| Average volume | 2.35M | 489.28K |
| Shares outstanding | 280.02M | 42.10M |
| Employees | 1,762 | 37 |
| Sector | Energy | Energy |
| Industry | Oil & Gas E&P | Oil & Gas E&P |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Diamondback Energy is about 74.2 times larger than Vitesse Energy by market value ($53.67B vs $722.93M).
- FANG has outperformed VTS by 54.9 percentage points over the past year.
- Vitesse Energy offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (11.65% vs 2.22%).
About Diamondback Energy
FANG stock →Diamondback Energy, Inc., an independent oil and natural gas company, acquires, develops, explores, and exploits unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin in West Texas, the United States. The company primarily focuses on the development of the Spraberry and Wolfcamp formations of the Midland Basin; and the Wolfcamp and Bone Spring formations of the Delaware Basin, both of which are part of the Permian Basin in West Texas and New Mexico.
Energy · Oil & Gas E&P · 1,762 employees
About Vitesse Energy
VTS stock →Vitesse Energy, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the acquisition, development, and production of non-operated oil and natural gas properties in the United States. The company acquires and owns non-operated working interest and royalty interest ownership in the Williston Basin properties covering 53,301 net acres located in North Dakota and Montana.
Energy · Oil & Gas E&P · 37 employees
FANG vs VTS FAQ
Which is bigger, Diamondback Energy or Vitesse Energy?
Diamondback Energy (FANG) is larger, with a market capitalization of $53.67B compared with $722.93M for Vitesse Energy (VTS).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FANG or VTS?
FANG returned +28.58% over the past 12 months, compared with -26.28% for VTS (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Diamondback Energy or Vitesse Energy?
Vitesse Energy has the higher yield at 11.65%, compared with 2.22% for Diamondback Energy.
Are Diamondback Energy and Vitesse Energy in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Oil & Gas E&P industry within the Energy sector.