Franklin Electric (FELE) vs Enpro (NPO)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Enpro (NPO) has outperformed Franklin Electric (FELE) over the past year, gaining 37.3% versus a gain of 2.3%. Over five years, NPO leads with a +252.1% price change compared with +15.7% for FELE. Enpro is the larger company by market cap ($6.51 billion vs $4.28 billion), about 1.5 times the size.
On valuation, Franklin Electric trades at a lower forward P/E (18.8x vs 28.3x for Enpro). Franklin Electric offers the higher dividend yield (1.13% vs 0.41%). Franklin Electric converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 6.9% versus 3.5%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FELE | NPO |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $96.87 | $307.68 |
| Market cap | $4.28B | $6.51B |
| 1-day change | -0.74% | -3.15% |
| YTD return | +1.40% | +43.69% |
| 1-year return | +2.29% | +37.31% |
| 5-year return | +15.73% | +252.08% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 27.92 | 149.36 |
| Forward P/E | 18.76 | 28.26 |
| EPS (TTM) | $3.47 | $2.06 |
| Dividend yield | 1.13% | 0.41% |
| Annual dividend | $1.09 | $1.26 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.13B | $1.14B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +5.44% | +9.02% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $147.09M | $40.50M |
| Gross margin | 35.47% | 42.64% |
| Operating margin | 12.62% | 14.13% |
| Net margin | 6.90% | 3.54% |
| 52-week high | $115.82 | $390.42 |
| 52-week low | $89.54 | $202.00 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -16.36% | -21.19% |
| Analyst consensus | none | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +22.33% | +26.59% |
| Average volume | 285.51K | 183.61K |
| Shares outstanding | 44.21M | 21.17M |
| Employees | 6,500 | 4,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Industrials |
| Industry | Metal Fabrications | Metal Fabrications |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- NPO has outperformed FELE by 35.0 percentage points over the past year.
- Enpro trades at a higher earnings multiple (149.4x vs 27.9x trailing P/E).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: Franklin Electric in Consumer Discretionary and Enpro in Industrials.
About Franklin Electric
FELE stock →Franklin Electric Co., Inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs, manufactures, and distributes water and fuel pumping systems in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific. It operates through Water Systems, Energy Systems, and Distribution segments.
Consumer Discretionary · Metal Fabrications · 6,500 employees
About Enpro
NPO stock →Enpro Inc., an industrial technology company, design, develops, manufactures, and markets proprietary, value-added products and solutions to safeguard critical environments in the United States, Europe, Asia Pacific, and internationally. It operates in two segments, Sealing Technologies and Advanced Surface Technologies.
Industrials · Metal Fabrications · 4,000 employees
FELE vs NPO FAQ
Which is bigger, Franklin Electric or Enpro?
Enpro (NPO) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.51B compared with $4.28B for Franklin Electric (FELE).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FELE or NPO?
NPO returned +37.31% over the past 12 months, compared with +2.29% for FELE (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, FELE or NPO?
FELE has the lower trailing P/E at 27.9, versus 149.4 for NPO. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Franklin Electric or Enpro?
Franklin Electric has the higher yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.41% for Enpro.
Are Franklin Electric and Enpro in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Metal Fabrications industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.