MetaCap

Ferrovial N.V. (FER) vs Lockheed Martin (LMT)

Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.

Summary

Lockheed Martin (LMT) has outperformed Ferrovial N.V. (FER) over the past year, losing 2.3% versus a loss of 16.2%. Over five years, FER leads with a +72.1% price change compared with +36.5% for LMT. Lockheed Martin is the larger company by market cap ($115.22 billion vs $36.42 billion), about 3.2 times the size.

On valuation, Lockheed Martin trades at a lower forward P/E (15.3x vs 38.0x for Ferrovial N.V.). Lockheed Martin offers the higher dividend yield (2.73% vs 1.10%).

Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology

Relative performance

FER-16.03%LMT-2.92%
+34%+8%-18%
Oct 6, 20251 yearOct 7, 2026
FER+72.11%LMT+41.12%
+162%+64%-34%
Oct 4, 20215 yearsOct 5, 2026

Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.

Head-to-head

FER versus LMT key metrics
MetricFERLMT
Share price$50.60$499.22
Market cap$36.42B$115.22B
1-day change-1.67%-2.14%
YTD return-21.68%+3.22%
1-year return-16.17%-2.32%
5-year return+72.11%+36.54%
P/E ratio (TTM)27.8018.40
Forward P/E37.9715.27
EPS (TTM)$1.82$27.13
Dividend yield1.10%2.73%
Annual dividend$0.558$13.65
Revenue (latest FY)—$75.05B
Revenue growth (YoY)—+5.64%
Net income (latest FY)—$5.02B
Gross margin—10.15%
Operating margin—10.30%
Net margin—6.69%
52-week high$74.79$692.00
52-week low$50.36$437.25
Distance from 52-week high-32.34%-27.86%
Analyst consensusbuybuy
Avg. price target upside+43.75%+26.37%
Average volume1.53M1.13M
Shares outstanding719.79M230.79M
Employees22,359123,000
SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
IndustryMilitary/Government/TechnicalMilitary/Government/Technical

Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.

Key differences

  • Lockheed Martin is about 3.2 times larger than Ferrovial N.V. by market value ($115.22B vs $36.42B).
  • LMT has outperformed FER by 13.9 percentage points over the past year.
  • Ferrovial N.V. trades at a higher earnings multiple (27.8x vs 18.4x trailing P/E).
  • Lockheed Martin offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.73% vs 1.10%).

About Ferrovial N.V.

FER stock →

Ferrovial N.V., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. It operates through four segments: Construction, Highways, Airports, and Energy.

Industrials · Military/Government/Technical · 22,359 employees

About Lockheed Martin

LMT stock →

Lockheed Martin Corporation, an aerospace and defense company, engages in the research, design, development, manufacture, integration, and sustainment of technology systems, products, and services in the United States, Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and internationally. The company operates through four segments: Aeronautics; Missiles and Fire Control (MFC); Rotary and Mission Systems (RMS); and Space.

Industrials · Military/Government/Technical · 123,000 employees

FER vs LMT FAQ

Which is bigger, Ferrovial N.V. or Lockheed Martin?

Lockheed Martin (LMT) is larger, with a market capitalization of $115.22B compared with $36.42B for Ferrovial N.V. (FER).

Which stock has performed better over the past year, FER or LMT?

LMT returned -2.32% over the past 12 months, compared with -16.17% for FER (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.

Which has the lower P/E ratio, FER or LMT?

LMT has the lower trailing P/E at 18.4, versus 27.8 for FER. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.

Which pays a higher dividend, Ferrovial N.V. or Lockheed Martin?

Lockheed Martin has the higher yield at 2.73%, compared with 1.10% for Ferrovial N.V..

Are Ferrovial N.V. and Lockheed Martin in the same industry?

Yes. Both are classified in the Military/Government/Technical industry within the Industrials sector.

More comparisons