Federated Hermes (FHI) vs PJT Partners (PJT)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 10, 2026.
Summary
Federated Hermes (FHI) has outperformed PJT Partners (PJT) over the past year, gaining 7.6% versus a loss of 20.4%. Over five years, FHI leads with a +71.2% price change compared with +62.7% for PJT. PJT Partners is the larger company by market cap ($5.85 billion vs $4.22 billion), about 1.4 times the size.
On valuation, Federated Hermes trades at a lower forward P/E (9.7x vs 15.8x for PJT Partners). Federated Hermes offers the higher dividend yield (2.48% vs 0.73%). Federated Hermes converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 22.4% versus 10.5%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FHI | PJT |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $56.52 | $137.28 |
| Market cap | $4.22B | $5.85B |
| 1-day change | +1.02% | +1.09% |
| YTD return | +8.55% | -17.89% |
| 1-year return | +7.58% | -20.40% |
| 5-year return | +71.17% | +62.69% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 10.43 | 18.75 |
| Forward P/E | 9.70 | 15.77 |
| EPS (TTM) | $5.42 | $7.32 |
| Dividend yield | 2.48% | 0.73% |
| Annual dividend | $1.40 | $1.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.80B | $1.71B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +10.33% | +14.77% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $403.30M | $180.12M |
| Operating margin | 28.54% | — |
| Net margin | 22.40% | 10.51% |
| 52-week high | $67.20 | $195.62 |
| 52-week low | $46.66 | $127.73 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -15.89% | -29.82% |
| Analyst consensus | hold | hold |
| Avg. price target upside | +6.40% | +22.38% |
| Average volume | 603.78K | 441.02K |
| Shares outstanding | 74.65M | 25.56M |
| Employees | 2,091 | 1,224 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Investment Managers |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- FHI has outperformed PJT by 28.0 percentage points over the past year.
- PJT Partners trades at a higher earnings multiple (18.8x vs 10.4x trailing P/E).
- Federated Hermes offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (2.48% vs 0.73%).
- Federated Hermes is more profitable, keeping 22.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 10.5 cents for PJT Partners.
About Federated Hermes
FHI stock →Federated Hermes, Inc. is a publicly owned investment manager.
Finance · Investment Managers · 2,091 employees
About PJT Partners
PJT stock →PJT Partners Inc., an investment bank, provides various strategic advisory, shareholder advisory, capital markets advisory, and restructuring and special situations services to corporations, financial sponsors, institutional investors, and governments worldwide. It offers advisory services to clients on various transactions, including mergers and acquisitions (M&A), spin-offs, activism defense, contested M&A, joint ventures, minority investments, and divestitures.
Finance · Investment Managers · 1,224 employees
FHI vs PJT FAQ
Which is bigger, Federated Hermes or PJT Partners?
PJT Partners (PJT) is larger, with a market capitalization of $5.85B compared with $4.22B for Federated Hermes (FHI).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FHI or PJT?
FHI returned +7.58% over the past 12 months, compared with -20.40% for PJT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, FHI or PJT?
FHI has the lower trailing P/E at 10.4, versus 18.8 for PJT. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, Federated Hermes or PJT Partners?
Federated Hermes has the higher yield at 2.48%, compared with 0.73% for PJT Partners.
Are Federated Hermes and PJT Partners in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Investment Managers industry within the Finance sector.