Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) vs TeraWulf (WULF)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 8, 2026.
Summary
TeraWulf (WULF) has outperformed Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR) over the past year, gaining 19.0% versus a loss of 37.4%. TeraWulf is the larger company by market cap ($7.19 billion vs $6.21 billion), about 1.2 times the size, while Figure Technology Solutions is growing revenue faster (+48.7% vs +20.3%). Figure Technology Solutions converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 26.4% versus -392.6%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FIGR | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $27.68 | $14.40 |
| Market cap | $6.21B | $7.19B |
| 1-day change | +1.21% | -3.81% |
| YTD return | -32.22% | +25.33% |
| 1-year return | -37.42% | +19.01% |
| 5-year return | — | -52.08% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 29.76 | — |
| Forward P/E | 14.65 | — |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.93 | $-4.43 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $506.87M | $168.46M |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +48.69% | +20.28% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $133.86M | $-661.42M |
| Gross margin | — | 39.21% |
| Operating margin | 23.19% | -110.54% |
| Net margin | 26.41% | -392.64% |
| 52-week high | $78.00 | $29.84 |
| 52-week low | $24.11 | $10.47 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -64.51% | -51.74% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | strong_buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +91.47% | +132.50% |
| Average volume | 4.16M | 31.10M |
| Shares outstanding | 185.67M | 498.97M |
| Employees | 602 | 141 |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Industry | Finance: Consumer Services | Finance: Consumer Services |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- WULF has outperformed FIGR by 56.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Figure Technology Solutions is more profitable, keeping 26.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -392.6 cents for TeraWulf.
- Figure Technology Solutions grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+48.69% vs +20.28%).
About Figure Technology Solutions
FIGR stock →Figure Technology Solutions, Inc., a financial technology company, provides blockchain-based products and solutions in the United States. The company offers a suite of blockchain-based solutions for its marketplaces, including lending, trading, and investing activities in areas, such as consumer credit and digital assets.
Finance · Finance: Consumer Services · 602 employees
About TeraWulf
WULF stock →TeraWulf Inc., together with its subsidiaries, owns, develops, operates digital infrastructure in the United States. It also develops and operates bitcoin mining facilities for bitcoin mining and high-performance computing workloads, leveraging clean, cost-effective, and reliable energy.
Finance · Finance: Consumer Services · 141 employees
FIGR vs WULF FAQ
Which is bigger, Figure Technology Solutions or TeraWulf?
TeraWulf (WULF) is larger, with a market capitalization of $7.19B compared with $6.21B for Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FIGR or WULF?
WULF returned +19.01% over the past 12 months, compared with -37.42% for FIGR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Are Figure Technology Solutions and TeraWulf in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Finance: Consumer Services industry within the Finance sector.