FIGS (FIGS) vs PVH (PVH)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
FIGS (FIGS) has outperformed PVH (PVH) over the past year, gaining 117.1% versus a loss of 3.7%. Over five years, PVH leads with a -26.2% price change compared with -58.8% for FIGS. PVH is the larger company by market cap ($3.74 billion vs $2.49 billion), about 1.5 times the size, while FIGS is growing revenue faster (+13.6% vs +3.4%).
On valuation, PVH trades at a lower forward P/E (6.5x vs 39.3x for FIGS). PVH pays a dividend yielding 0.18%, while FIGS does not currently pay one. FIGS converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 5.4% versus 0.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FIGS | PVH |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $14.98 | $81.14 |
| Market cap | $2.49B | $3.74B |
| 1-day change | +6.54% | +3.59% |
| YTD return | +31.87% | +21.07% |
| 1-year return | +117.10% | -3.73% |
| 5-year return | -58.77% | -26.24% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 42.80 | — |
| Forward P/E | 39.30 | 6.49 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.35 | $-3.46 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.18% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.15 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $631.10M | $8.95B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +13.60% | +3.44% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $34.25M | $25.30M |
| Gross margin | 66.53% | 57.52% |
| Operating margin | 6.04% | 2.58% |
| Net margin | 5.43% | 0.28% |
| 52-week high | $17.48 | $100.75 |
| 52-week low | $6.77 | $59.60 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -14.30% | -19.46% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +24.37% | +11.94% |
| Average volume | 2.97M | 948.09K |
| Shares outstanding | 157.86M | 46.14M |
| Employees | 330 | 15,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Industrials |
| Industry | Apparel | Garments and Clothing |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- FIGS has outperformed PVH by 120.8 percentage points over the past year.
- FIGS is more profitable, keeping 5.4 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 0.3 cents for PVH.
- FIGS grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+13.60% vs +3.44%).
- The two companies sit in different sectors: FIGS in Consumer Discretionary and PVH in Industrials.
About FIGS
FIGS stock →FIGS, Inc., together with its subsidiary, FIGS Canada, Inc., operates as a direct-to-consumer healthcare apparel and lifestyle company in the United States and internationally. The company designs and sells scrubwear and non-scrubwear offerings, such as outerwear, underscrubs, footwear, compression socks, lab coats, loungewear, and other apparel.
Consumer Discretionary · Apparel · 330 employees
About PVH
PVH stock →PVH Corp., together with its subsidiaries, operates as an apparel company in the United States and internationally. The company operates through Tommy Hilfiger North America, Tommy Hilfiger International, Calvin Klein North America, Calvin Klein International, and Heritage Brands Wholesale segments.
Industrials · Garments and Clothing · 15,000 employees
FIGS vs PVH FAQ
Which is bigger, FIGS or PVH?
PVH (PVH) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.74B compared with $2.49B for FIGS (FIGS).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FIGS or PVH?
FIGS returned +117.10% over the past 12 months, compared with -3.73% for PVH (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, FIGS or PVH?
PVH pays a dividend yielding 0.18%, while FIGS does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are FIGS and PVH in the same industry?
No. FIGS is in the Consumer Discretionary sector, while PVH is in Industrials.