FIGS (FIGS) vs Tapestry (TPR)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
FIGS (FIGS) has outperformed Tapestry (TPR) over the past year, gaining 117.1% versus a loss of 0.8%. Over five years, TPR leads with a +195.5% price change compared with -58.8% for FIGS. Tapestry is the larger company by market cap ($22.98 billion vs $2.49 billion), about 9.2 times the size.
On valuation, Tapestry trades at a lower forward P/E (13.0x vs 39.3x for FIGS). Tapestry pays a dividend yielding 1.38%, while FIGS does not currently pay one. Tapestry converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 19.1% versus 5.4%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FIGS | TPR |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $14.98 | $115.82 |
| Market cap | $2.49B | $22.98B |
| 1-day change | +6.54% | +2.12% |
| YTD return | +31.87% | -9.35% |
| 1-year return | +117.10% | -0.85% |
| 5-year return | -58.77% | +195.46% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 45.39 | 15.93 |
| Forward P/E | 39.30 | 13.01 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.33 | $7.27 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.38% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1.60 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $631.10M | $8.00B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +13.60% | +14.17% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $34.25M | $1.53B |
| Gross margin | 66.53% | 77.82% |
| Operating margin | 6.04% | 23.92% |
| Net margin | 5.43% | 19.09% |
| 52-week high | $17.48 | $164.80 |
| 52-week low | $6.77 | $93.00 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -14.30% | -29.72% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +24.37% | +43.76% |
| Average volume | 2.97M | 3.03M |
| Shares outstanding | 157.86M | 198.44M |
| Employees | 330 | 12,600 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Apparel | Apparel |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Tapestry is about 9.2 times larger than FIGS by market value ($22.98B vs $2.49B).
- FIGS has outperformed TPR by 117.9 percentage points over the past year.
- FIGS trades at a higher earnings multiple (45.4x vs 15.9x trailing P/E).
- Tapestry offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (1.38% vs 0.00%).
- Tapestry is more profitable, keeping 19.1 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus 5.4 cents for FIGS.
About FIGS
FIGS stock →FIGS, Inc., together with its subsidiary, FIGS Canada, Inc., operates as a direct-to-consumer healthcare apparel and lifestyle company in the United States and internationally. The company designs and sells scrubwear and non-scrubwear offerings, such as outerwear, underscrubs, footwear, compression socks, lab coats, loungewear, and other apparel.
Consumer Discretionary · Apparel · 330 employees
About Tapestry
TPR stock →Tapestry, Inc. provides accessories and lifestyle brand products in North America, Greater China, rest of Asia, and internationally.
Consumer Discretionary · Apparel · 12,600 employees
FIGS vs TPR FAQ
Which is bigger, FIGS or Tapestry?
Tapestry (TPR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $22.98B compared with $2.49B for FIGS (FIGS).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FIGS or TPR?
FIGS returned +117.10% over the past 12 months, compared with -0.85% for TPR (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, FIGS or TPR?
TPR has the lower trailing P/E at 15.9, versus 45.4 for FIGS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, FIGS or Tapestry?
Tapestry pays a dividend yielding 1.38%, while FIGS does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are FIGS and Tapestry in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Apparel industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.