FIGS (FIGS) vs Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. (ZGN)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
FIGS (FIGS) has outperformed Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. (ZGN) over the past year, gaining 117.1% versus a gain of 23.6%. Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. is the larger company by market cap ($3.37 billion vs $2.49 billion), about 1.4 times the size. On valuation, Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. trades at a lower forward P/E (21.0x vs 39.3x for FIGS).
Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. pays a dividend yielding 0.96%, while FIGS does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FIGS | ZGN |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $14.98 | $12.52 |
| Market cap | $2.49B | $3.37B |
| 1-day change | +6.54% | +2.71% |
| YTD return | +31.87% | +22.15% |
| 1-year return | +117.10% | +23.59% |
| 5-year return | -58.77% | — |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 45.39 | 35.77 |
| Forward P/E | 39.30 | 21.01 |
| EPS (TTM) | $0.33 | $0.35 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.96% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.12 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $631.10M | — |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +13.60% | — |
| Net income (latest FY) | $34.25M | — |
| Gross margin | 66.53% | — |
| Operating margin | 6.04% | — |
| Net margin | 5.43% | — |
| 52-week high | $17.48 | $15.95 |
| 52-week low | $6.77 | $8.64 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -14.30% | -21.50% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +24.37% | +15.42% |
| Average volume | 2.97M | 1.10M |
| Shares outstanding | 157.86M | 268.89M |
| Employees | 330 | 7,600 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Apparel | Apparel |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- FIGS has outperformed ZGN by 93.5 percentage points over the past year.
- FIGS trades at a higher earnings multiple (45.4x vs 35.8x trailing P/E).
About FIGS
FIGS stock →FIGS, Inc., together with its subsidiary, FIGS Canada, Inc., operates as a direct-to-consumer healthcare apparel and lifestyle company in the United States and internationally. The company designs and sells scrubwear and non-scrubwear offerings, such as outerwear, underscrubs, footwear, compression socks, lab coats, loungewear, and other apparel.
Consumer Discretionary · Apparel · 330 employees
About Ermenegildo Zegna N.V.
ZGN stock →Ermenegildo Zegna N.V., together with its subsidiaries, designs, produces, markets, and distributes luxury menswear and womenwear, children's clothing, footwear, leather goods, and other accessories worldwide. It offers luxury leisurewear, such as knitwear, jeans, jersey and shirts, fabric and leather outerwear, and accessories; formalwear, including formal suits to tuxedos, shirts, blazers, formal coats, and accessories; and leather accessories comprising sneakers and other shoes, bags, belts and small leather accessories.
Consumer Discretionary · Apparel · 7,600 employees
FIGS vs ZGN FAQ
Which is bigger, FIGS or Ermenegildo Zegna N.V.?
Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. (ZGN) is larger, with a market capitalization of $3.37B compared with $2.49B for FIGS (FIGS).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FIGS or ZGN?
FIGS returned +117.10% over the past 12 months, compared with +23.59% for ZGN (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, FIGS or ZGN?
ZGN has the lower trailing P/E at 35.8, versus 45.4 for FIGS. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Which pays a higher dividend, FIGS or Ermenegildo Zegna N.V.?
Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. pays a dividend yielding 0.96%, while FIGS does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are FIGS and Ermenegildo Zegna N.V. in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Apparel industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.