National Beverage (FIZZ) vs Monster Beverage (MNST)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 7, 2026.
Summary
Monster Beverage (MNST) has outperformed National Beverage (FIZZ) over the past year, gaining 25.8% versus a loss of 20.5%. Over five years, MNST leads with a +100.4% price change compared with -46.4% for FIZZ. Monster Beverage is the larger company by market cap ($84.00 billion vs $2.77 billion), about 30.3 times the size.
On valuation, National Beverage trades at a lower forward P/E (15.1x vs 32.8x for Monster Beverage).
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FIZZ | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $29.60 | $42.88 |
| Market cap | $2.77B | $84.00B |
| 1-day change | -1.40% | -0.86% |
| YTD return | -7.18% | +11.86% |
| 1-year return | -20.54% | +25.84% |
| 5-year return | -46.36% | +100.42% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 15.91 | 39.70 |
| Forward P/E | 15.14 | 32.78 |
| EPS (TTM) | $1.86 | $1.08 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $8.29B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | +10.70% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $1.91B |
| Gross margin | — | 55.85% |
| Operating margin | — | 29.17% |
| Net margin | — | 22.97% |
| 52-week high | $38.21 | $50.17 |
| 52-week low | $28.97 | $32.94 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -22.53% | -14.53% |
| Analyst consensus | none | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +4.73% | +16.65% |
| Average volume | 419.45K | 10.49M |
| Shares outstanding | 93.62M | 1.96B |
| Employees | 1,677 | 5,773 |
| Sector | Consumer Staples | Consumer Staples |
| Industry | Beverages (Production/Distribution) | Beverages (Production/Distribution) |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Monster Beverage is about 30.3 times larger than National Beverage by market value ($84.00B vs $2.77B).
- MNST has outperformed FIZZ by 46.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Monster Beverage trades at a higher earnings multiple (39.7x vs 15.9x trailing P/E).
About National Beverage
FIZZ stock →National Beverage Corp., through its subsidiaries, develops, produces, markets, and sells a portfolio of sparkling waters, juices, energy drinks, and carbonated soft drinks in the United States and Canada. The company's Power+ brand portfolio offers sparkling water products under the LaCroix brands; non-carbonated water under the Clear Fruit; energy drink and shots under the Rip It brand; juice and juice-based products under Everfresh, Everfresh Premier Varietals, and Mr.
Consumer Staples · Beverages (Production/Distribution) · 1,677 employees
About Monster Beverage
MNST stock →Monster Beverage Corporation, through its subsidiaries, engages in development, marketing, sale, and distribution of energy drink beverages and concentrates in the United States and internationally. The company operates through four segments: Monster Energy Drinks, Strategic Brands, Alcohol Brands, and Other.
Consumer Staples · Beverages (Production/Distribution) · 5,773 employees
FIZZ vs MNST FAQ
Which is bigger, National Beverage or Monster Beverage?
Monster Beverage (MNST) is larger, with a market capitalization of $84.00B compared with $2.77B for National Beverage (FIZZ).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FIZZ or MNST?
MNST returned +25.84% over the past 12 months, compared with -20.54% for FIZZ (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which has the lower P/E ratio, FIZZ or MNST?
FIZZ has the lower trailing P/E at 15.9, versus 39.7 for MNST. A lower P/E is not by itself a sign of a better investment; it can reflect slower expected growth or higher risk.
Are National Beverage and Monster Beverage in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Beverages (Production/Distribution) industry within the Consumer Staples sector.