Full House Resorts (FLL) vs Las Vegas Sands (LVS)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Las Vegas Sands (LVS) has outperformed Full House Resorts (FLL) over the past year, losing 32.2% versus a loss of 55.8%. Over five years, LVS leads with a -10.0% price change compared with -89.5% for FLL. Las Vegas Sands is the larger company by market cap ($23.38 billion vs $44.7 million), about 523.0 times the size.
Las Vegas Sands pays a dividend yielding 3.19%, while Full House Resorts does not currently pay one.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FLL | LVS |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $1.22 | $36.10 |
| Market cap | $44.71M | $23.38B |
| 1-day change | -3.17% | +0.81% |
| YTD return | -53.26% | -44.54% |
| 1-year return | -55.80% | -32.23% |
| 5-year return | -89.50% | -9.98% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 14.05 |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.32 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-1.02 | $2.57 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.19% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $1.15 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | — | $13.02B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | +15.22% |
| Net income (latest FY) | — | $1.63B |
| Operating margin | — | 21.65% |
| Net margin | — | 12.50% |
| 52-week high | $3.37 | $70.45 |
| 52-week low | $1.15 | $35.28 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -63.80% | -48.76% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +145.90% | +62.74% |
| Average volume | 146.23K | 5.41M |
| Shares outstanding | 36.64M | 647.70M |
| Employees | 1,573 | 41,000 |
| Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| Industry | Hotels/Resorts | Hotels/Resorts |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Las Vegas Sands is about 523.0 times larger than Full House Resorts by market value ($23.38B vs $44.71M).
- LVS has outperformed FLL by 23.6 percentage points over the past year.
- Las Vegas Sands offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield (3.19% vs 0.00%).
About Full House Resorts
FLL stock →Full House Resorts, Inc. owns, leases, develops, manages, operates, and/or invests in casinos, and related hospitality and entertainment facilities in the United States.
Consumer Discretionary · Hotels/Resorts · 1,573 employees
About Las Vegas Sands
LVS stock →Las Vegas Sands Corp., together with its subsidiaries, owns, develops, and operates integrated resorts in Macao and Singapore. It owns and operates The Venetian Macao Resort Hotel, The Londoner Macao, The Parisian Macao, The Plaza Macao and Four Seasons Hotel Macao, and The Sands Macao in Macao, the People's Republic of China; and Marina Bay Sands in Singapore.
Consumer Discretionary · Hotels/Resorts · 41,000 employees
FLL vs LVS FAQ
Which is bigger, Full House Resorts or Las Vegas Sands?
Las Vegas Sands (LVS) is larger, with a market capitalization of $23.38B compared with $44.71M for Full House Resorts (FLL).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FLL or LVS?
LVS returned -32.23% over the past 12 months, compared with -55.80% for FLL (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Full House Resorts or Las Vegas Sands?
Las Vegas Sands pays a dividend yielding 3.19%, while Full House Resorts does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Full House Resorts and Las Vegas Sands in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Hotels/Resorts industry within the Consumer Discretionary sector.