Fluor (FLR) vs Granite Construction (GVA)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Fluor (FLR) has outperformed Granite Construction (GVA) over the past year, gaining 15.8% versus a gain of 6.3%. Over five years, FLR leads with a +192.8% price change compared with +190.2% for GVA. Fluor is the larger company by market cap ($6.82 billion vs $5.06 billion), about 1.3 times the size, while Granite Construction is growing revenue faster (+10.4% vs -5.0%).
On valuation, Granite Construction trades at a lower forward P/E (14.1x vs 15.2x for Fluor). Granite Construction pays a dividend yielding 0.46%, while Fluor does not currently pay one. Granite Construction converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 4.4% versus -0.3%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FLR | GVA |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $51.01 | $113.83 |
| Market cap | $6.82B | $5.06B |
| 1-day change | -0.25% | -0.73% |
| YTD return | +28.72% | -1.32% |
| 1-year return | +15.83% | +6.32% |
| 5-year return | +192.82% | +190.16% |
| Forward P/E | 15.15 | 14.13 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-11.90 | $-4.32 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.46% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.52 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $15.50B | $4.42B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -4.98% | +10.40% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-51.00M | $193.00M |
| Gross margin | -0.77% | 16.07% |
| Operating margin | -2.44% | 6.38% |
| Net margin | -0.33% | 4.36% |
| 52-week high | $58.35 | $162.08 |
| 52-week low | $39.33 | $97.26 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -12.58% | -29.77% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | none |
| Avg. price target upside | +20.94% | +50.81% |
| Average volume | 2.41M | 739.38K |
| Shares outstanding | 133.74M | 44.43M |
| Employees | 22,995 | 2,500 |
| Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| Industry | Military/Government/Technical | Engineering & Construction |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- Granite Construction grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+10.40% vs -4.98%).
About Fluor
FLR stock →Fluor Corporation provides engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC); fabrication and modularization; and project management services worldwide. The company operates through three segments: Urban Solutions, Energy Solutions, and Mission Solutions.
Industrials · Military/Government/Technical · 22,995 employees
About Granite Construction
GVA stock →Granite Construction Incorporated provides infrastructure solutions for public and private clients in the United States. It operates through Construction and Materials segments.
Industrials · Engineering & Construction · 2,500 employees
FLR vs GVA FAQ
Which is bigger, Fluor or Granite Construction?
Fluor (FLR) is larger, with a market capitalization of $6.82B compared with $5.06B for Granite Construction (GVA).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FLR or GVA?
FLR returned +15.83% over the past 12 months, compared with +6.32% for GVA (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Which pays a higher dividend, Fluor or Granite Construction?
Granite Construction pays a dividend yielding 0.46%, while Fluor does not currently pay a regular dividend.
Are Fluor and Granite Construction in the same industry?
Both are in the Industrials sector, but in different industries: Military/Government/Technical for Fluor and Engineering & Construction for Granite Construction.