Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) vs Zoom Communications (ZM)
Head-to-head comparison of performance, valuation, growth, profitability and dividends. Prices delayed 15 minutes; data as of Oct 9, 2026.
Summary
Zoom Communications (ZM) has outperformed Flutter Entertainment (FLUT) over the past year, gaining 18.6% versus a loss of 66.8%. Over five years, FLUT leads with a -59.2% price change compared with -64.4% for ZM. Zoom Communications is the larger company by market cap ($27.62 billion vs $14.16 billion), about 2.0 times the size, while Flutter Entertainment is growing revenue faster (+16.6% vs +4.4%).
On valuation, Flutter Entertainment trades at a lower forward P/E (11.5x vs 14.9x for Zoom Communications). Zoom Communications converts more of its revenue into profit, with a net margin of 39.0% versus -2.5%.
Summary generated from market data by MetaCap's automated system. Methodology
Relative performance
Percent change in share price from the first common trading day shown; excludes dividends.
Head-to-head
| Metric | FLUT | ZM |
|---|---|---|
| Share price | $81.58 | $94.67 |
| Market cap | $14.16B | $27.62B |
| 1-day change | +7.55% | -0.11% |
| YTD return | -62.06% | +9.71% |
| 1-year return | -66.84% | +18.56% |
| 5-year return | -59.24% | -64.41% |
| P/E ratio (TTM) | — | 8.78 |
| Forward P/E | 11.50 | 14.93 |
| EPS (TTM) | $-4.26 | $10.78 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Annual dividend | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $16.38B | $4.87B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +16.62% | +4.36% |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-407.00M | $1.90B |
| Gross margin | 45.19% | 77.02% |
| Operating margin | 0.22% | 23.08% |
| Net margin | -2.48% | 39.03% |
| 52-week high | $255.26 | $114.74 |
| 52-week low | $73.50 | $70.70 |
| Distance from 52-week high | -68.04% | -17.49% |
| Analyst consensus | buy | buy |
| Avg. price target upside | +65.13% | +24.90% |
| Average volume | 2.99M | 3.09M |
| Shares outstanding | 173.54M | 263.23M |
| Employees | 28,518 | 7,438 |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Computer Software: Programming Data Processing | Computer Software: Programming Data Processing |
Highlighted cells mark the higher value for growth, returns, margins and yield, and the lower value for P/E ratios. Highlighting is a mechanical comparison, not a recommendation.
Key differences
- ZM has outperformed FLUT by 85.4 percentage points over the past year.
- Zoom Communications is more profitable, keeping 39.0 cents of every revenue dollar as net income versus -2.5 cents for Flutter Entertainment.
- Flutter Entertainment grew revenue faster in its latest fiscal year (+16.62% vs +4.36%).
About Flutter Entertainment
FLUT stock →Flutter Entertainment plc operates as a sports betting and gaming company in the United States, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, Italy, and internationally. It provides sportsbooks; iGaming products, such as blackjack, roulette, slot machines, poker, and rummy, as well as lottery products; and sports betting products, which include Betfair betting exchanges, daily fantasy sports, and horse racing wagering under the TVG brand.
Technology · Computer Software: Programming Data Processing · 28,518 employees
About Zoom Communications
ZM stock →Zoom Communications, Inc. provides an Artificial Intelligence-first open work platform for human connection in the Americas, the Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.
Technology · Computer Software: Programming Data Processing · 7,438 employees
FLUT vs ZM FAQ
Which is bigger, Flutter Entertainment or Zoom Communications?
Zoom Communications (ZM) is larger, with a market capitalization of $27.62B compared with $14.16B for Flutter Entertainment (FLUT).
Which stock has performed better over the past year, FLUT or ZM?
ZM returned +18.56% over the past 12 months, compared with -66.84% for FLUT (price return, excluding dividends). Past performance does not predict future results.
Are Flutter Entertainment and Zoom Communications in the same industry?
Yes. Both are classified in the Computer Software: Programming Data Processing industry within the Technology sector.